[KC_Conspirator]

Internal polling is said to show Trump nearing a remarkable DOUBLE-DIGIT...

I am sorry to call BS, but this article is total and utter bullshine. The campaign has no such "internal polling".

[Williams]

Which campaign? I think they mean Hillary’s polling is showing a blowout. Odd election, because FL has lots of Hispanics and blacks in cities. Article makes it sound like a straight up conservative state.

[Helicondelta]

You are wrong. DC Whispers has an excellent track record.

[MMaschin]

I am sorry to call BS, but this article is total and utter bullshine. The campaign has no such "internal polling".


That is incorrect, EVERY campaign does it's own internal, or independent polling. They pay a great deal of money for this polling, and it's WAY more detailed. While a typical state poll, that is put out by an organization will usually look at the state as a whole, the internal polls will typically break down the state into many smaller polls. That way, they have a much better understanding of what is going on in different parts of the state, and where to dedicate their resources.


For example, in FL the I4 corridor has always been a good indicator of the state, because is a swing area, and usually swings to the winner. But lets say in this election internal polling in the northern part of the state indicates higher than normal turnout. In that case, instead of swinging a limited number of votes in central FL, they might want to concentrate where they know they have a large number of votes, and concentrate in the SE FL, and getting those votes to the polls. It just happens that that is exactly where Clinton is today.

[Lazamataz]

You are wrong. But Pepe still loves you.

[SamAdams76]

The campaign has no such "internal polling".

How would you know? Not saying this is true or untrue because I have no way of knowing and I doubt that you do either.