Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: walkingdead
The anti-American standards of an Obama's military, used against our soldiers in Iraq, are neither the standard I or any FReeper should apply to them OR to our cops in the violent lawless streets of so many places in America.

To do so would be standing with the anti-Americans hellbent on destroying the ability of America's military to protect us abroad and destroying the ability of America's police to protect us at home!

29 posted on 09/29/2016 6:05:07 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: drpix

The ROE for our soldiers in combat has been cumbersome for quite some time, it is not new to this horrible administration. The ROE for our soldiers (in my lifetime) has basically ranged from from visual of weapon to actually being shot at before they could “defend” themselves. This in a combat zone mind you.

We now are seeing officer involved shootings where they are considered “justified” if there was a visual of a weapon or the “appearance” of a weapon. There are even some which are deemed “justified” due to finding a gun on the person after he is down (read no visual of weapon). And even a slight few deemed “justified” where the person “acted” in a way that made the officer think he might be trying to reach for something that might be a weapon.

We are on a very slippery slope when we offer American citizens less restraint than that we demand for the enemy in warfare.

As far as the police, they have a very important job with a major amount of trust levied to them by We The People. They are entrusted with the right to take away that which is most precious to an American citizen....their freedom. They must be held to a very high standard.

Now, this guy with the pipe. Middle of Iraq, you probably could have shot this guy, he certainly looked the part of aggressor with a weapon. I do not necessarily think this was a completely unjustifiable use of force.

I do though worry about the visual of weapon = justified. How are We The People supposed to exercise our God given right to bear arms, if visual of weapon is sufficient to use deadly force? It wasn’t more than 30 years ago that every truck had rifles hanging in the back window. I do not remember a load of citizens being shot by police back then. What has changed? Has policy changed? Has law enforcement teaching changed? Something has changed, and it is not for the better.

We are marching further and further away from that which our forefathers left us. We would do well to study those before us.


31 posted on 09/29/2016 8:20:50 AM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson