Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple patents bold new innovation – a paper bag
The Guardian / The US Patent and Trademark Office ^ | Sept 20, 2016 | HAL90210

Posted on 09/21/2016 9:05:04 AM PDT by Shanghai Dan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: 13foxtrot

Hopefully it never issues.

1. Each independent claim is for an entirely different “invention”. They do not relate to each other at all, nor even cover the same concept (claim 1 is for a paper bag, claim 13 is for a retractable handle, claim 17 is for a collar reinforcement).

2. There is prior art for each and every independent claim on the patent (and thus, all dependents are automatically voided as well).

3. This is a very embarrassing thing for a supposedly advanced tech company to do! A patent on a paper bag? One that’s been available since at least 2009 (that I found with a quick, 10 second Google search)?

4. There is nothing novel here, nor non-obvious. White paper bags with post-consumer content have been around forever, as have paper handles, and cardboard reinforced collars. Changing the percentage of recycled material, or having the handle retract internally versus externally, or using corrugated instead of flat stock cardboard is not “non-obvious” to someone skilled in the art (or, I would argue, in this case someone not skilled in the art).

Bogus patent app, I hope it’s tossed completely. Getting terrible applications like this pushed through lowers the value of all patents - it diminishes the whole system, and that includes patents that I have.


21 posted on 09/21/2016 10:59:51 AM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Shanghai Dan

The initial independent claims are too broad but will be narrowed during prosecution.

If it does issue, I assume it will very narrowly claim details related to the retractable handle, the pleating, and so on. Clearly, Apple spends a lot effort designing their packaging so I am not surprised they may think something about this bag is innovative.

Note: I have not (nor do I plan to) read the spec where such innovative details may be described.


22 posted on 09/21/2016 2:16:45 PM PDT by 13foxtrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

It’s not just an ordinary bag, it’s an iBag. Big difference


I think Hillary already has the patent on being the iBag


23 posted on 09/21/2016 5:26:59 PM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

I think you have confused the terms “iBag”and “HoBag”...


24 posted on 09/21/2016 11:46:37 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Shanghai Dan

Perhaps Apple’s CEO should patent a plastic bag and put it over his head.


25 posted on 09/22/2016 12:12:45 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Just one of a basket of deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson