Not really an apples to apples comparison because “dangerous candidate” doesn’t list either contender - results are anti trump.
But you searched a specific candidate and a specific name of a corrupt ruler and got those results.
Typing a neutral search like “Trump” shouldn’t result in bad photos and top stories that are anti. The wild article falsely accusing him of child rape was an old article in which the author bitter complained that the MSM would even followed up on (wow - even they didn’t pretend to believe the accusation)- yet it’s in the top results? Google must be searching for most repulsive articles regardless of their algorithm. There’s TONS of articles about Hillary’s corruption (e.g., all the WIkileaks) and that’s not on the top of her search results page?
I was not disagreeing with you.