The possible double is petite compared with Hillary. Even f she wore high heels, the possible double is on a smaller scale in face and form. I am thinking that part of the reason “Hillary” was seen walking alone and conversing with a child is that, if it’s a double, they didn’t want her to stand next to an SS agent or ANYONE else routinely in her entourage because the disparity in size would stand out at a glance. For example, they couldn’t put that double next to Huma very well - easy to note the smaller height and witdh, length of face if you stand her next to “known” people.
Having “Hillary” greet a child helps conceal the change in scale - it would need to be someone not likely to stand next to Hill again.
It should be easy to estimate the height of that woman for those trained to analyze photos - like measuring known objects in the picture and comparing the height of the known object to that of the woman.
THis potential double could wear heels but that would shorten the length of her “footprint” alot and it would slow her walk to shorter strides. Real Hill would not be wearing high heels - she was wearing ballerina flats when she collapsed and that’s largely because of her age and her physical struggle not to fall down.
And I do think the SS might not guard a double because they are not obligated to do so, but if it was posed as a security risk to have real Hill display her “health” by walking alone to playfully greet a child, they might support a limited tolerance for a double. But there’d have to be a limit - can’t have SS in on the fraud, it’d have to be posed as necessary security (e.g., false accusations made up by her campaign alleging known Republican “bitter clingers” or “deplorables” posing a threat to her survival.
OKAY so there’s a celebrity height comparison website that says this about Hill’s dimensions:
“Hillary Clinton height is around 5ft 6 in 167 cm. Hillary Clinton weighs nearly 132 lbs or 60 kg. As of 2016, she is 68 years old.”
THen the Washinton Times (May 2016) has an article snickering that Hill’s campaign is now claiming she’s 5’ 7” despite her campaign’s earlier claims that she’s 5’4” or 5’5 in order to better compete with the public image of Trump who is 6’ 2”. The suggestion is that historically taller people win the presidency so they exaggerate her height - was this the preparation for height disparity issues in photographs and public appearances or Hill is really lying about one more thing?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/23/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-matchup-set-to-test-s/