Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Viking 29031 is the Russian answer to the Land Rover
https://recombu.com ^ | 1/27/15 | Ben Griffin

Posted on 09/10/2016 3:14:20 PM PDT by BBell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: BBell
...and have a top speed of 80km/h

Google says that's 49 mph.

Not interstate highway friendly.

21 posted on 09/10/2016 4:39:50 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! - vote Trump 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

45 is the minimum for interstates. I’m sure the top speed will increase in the coming years. See post 11.


22 posted on 09/10/2016 4:46:38 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Is that so you can have a man with an AK manning each window?

______________

absolutely!

There is no sign that the EPA had anything to do with structuring and designing this vehicle.


23 posted on 09/10/2016 5:16:05 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian governments are the biggest killer of citizens in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BBell

“Viking”?

Shouldn’t it be the “Cossack”?


24 posted on 09/10/2016 5:22:41 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

That would make sense but I think Viking sounds better. After all, it is amphibious and the Cossacks were not known to be a Naval unit.


25 posted on 09/10/2016 5:34:37 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BBell
The original Russian all-terrain vehicle, the URAL:

The Ural has two-wheel drive (both back wheels) making it a real mountain got. Like the Viking it has limited top speed, around 55 or 60 on older models, a bit faster on new ones.

26 posted on 09/10/2016 5:38:54 PM PDT by Jack Black (Dispossession is an obliteration of memory, of place, and of identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

It would seem to have a useful reverse gear, too, based on those tire tracks.


27 posted on 09/10/2016 5:45:56 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BBell

OMG!!! They channeled the T-34 tank.


28 posted on 09/10/2016 5:57:40 PM PDT by libstripper (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell
From another article:

The VIKING is the only only amphibious off-road vehicle in the world to have passed through certification to meet worldwide regulations for unrestricted on-road use.

But I'm sure the nanny state would find an excuse to ban it.

Wonder what restrictions might hamper an Amphicar, given that it should be grandfathered in.
29 posted on 09/10/2016 7:27:54 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

You are right. So butch! Bring more All terrain vehicles that aren’t meant to do carpool duty.


30 posted on 09/10/2016 8:09:38 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The T-34 was probably the best tank of WWII. Cheap to build,easy to maintain,easy to operate,fast and maneuverable, deadly. I would not have wanted to put a bunch of Sherman tanks up against a bunch of T-34s. Even with Patton as my General.


31 posted on 09/10/2016 9:04:21 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BBell
I would never own a Range Rover. High maintenance and expensive to fix. Now I would love to own an old land rover. Low maintenance and cheap and easy to fix.

I have owned a 1987 Range Rover, a 1997 Discovery, and a 2008 Grand Cherokee.

I presently own a 2002 Excursion with a V10, a 1987 Mercedes Unimog U1300l, a 1966 Mercedes 404 Unimog, and a Belgian Army 1973 Land Rover Series III Lightweight.

The Range Rover required little maintenance.

The Disco was worse.

The Lightweight, normal.

The Grand Cherokee, horrible.

The 404 Unimog, a couple of engines, but easy change.

The U1300L, replaced one light bulb and a fan idler pulley bearing in 3 years. Drive it a lot, from northern New England to PA, and all over ME, NH, VT.

I would love to have a race prepared Kamaz though.

Bigger than the Unimog, over 1000 HP, and will do well over 100 MPH. Wins the Dakar Rally every year, lately in the truck division.

Made in Russia, of course.

32 posted on 09/10/2016 9:11:52 PM PDT by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
The Ural has two-wheel drive (both back wheels) making it a real mountain got. Like the Viking it has limited top speed, around 55 or 60 on older models, a bit faster on new ones.

The Ural is great as it can go twice as fast as a Rokon.

But the Rokon will go to the few places a Ural can't go.

Rokon is made in Rochester, NH, USA.

2WD, front and rear.

With the hollow wheels, floats, and can carry extra gas or water in the wheels.

Mine, a Rokon Trailbreaker, gets over 60 MPG.

33 posted on 09/10/2016 9:17:06 PM PDT by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
ONE seat in the front!! Right in the middle.

Land over fans!

The legendary center-steer LIVES again!

34 posted on 09/10/2016 9:20:17 PM PDT by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BBell
It’s supposed to be the only road legal off road amphibious vehicle in the world.

I wonder if a Hagglund is road legal anywhere?

35 posted on 09/10/2016 9:22:11 PM PDT by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mogger

When I was in the service I rode in those things and was pulled on skis behind them. Cold weather training Bridgeport, Ca.


36 posted on 09/11/2016 12:03:43 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BBell

My son was in the truck company at Camp Marguerita, Camp Pendleton. Since he had no license, they of course had him driving a 5-ton truck. but he signed up for all the training he could get approved, including Bridgeport. He was the only one in his class who could ski, so they sent him out to dig out snow banks and places to sleep. Got a lot of skiing in.

He came back and get accepted for embassy duty MSG.

Semper Fi


37 posted on 09/11/2016 12:09:51 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Proudly deplorable since 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mogger
You obviously have much more money then I have.

The Russians do build some tough, durable and reliable things in spite of what some people think.

The info on the range rovers I get is from all the car salesmen I know. They won't even take them in on trade ins because when people bring them in the range rovers usually require a few grand in repairs just for minor things like broken lights or non working instruments on the dashboard. The parts are very expensive. Also I have been told that they are prone to electrical problems that are a pain to fix. Now I am talking about the newer ones and I see the ones you have owned are older.

In regards to old soviet vehicles I would like to have a LuAZ 969M or a GAZ 69. They are both simple and you can pick them up pretty cheap.

38 posted on 09/11/2016 12:22:01 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BBell
I rented a Range Rover sport for a week, it was a piece of junk.

Putin taking a Lada Riva SUV made the news some time back


39 posted on 09/11/2016 12:29:15 PM PDT by Daffynition (*If you're not gonna tell the truth, then why start talking?*~ Gene Wilder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Don’t get me started on the silliness of putting a battalion of Marines, some of whom have never seen snow, on skis. With a combat load. Give them all snow shoes.


40 posted on 09/11/2016 12:29:29 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson