Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 Surprisingly Brutal Facts About Dragonflies
LISTVERSE.COM ^ | 18 APRIL 2013 | ANDREW HANDLEY

Posted on 08/24/2016 5:01:41 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Um, since they mostly eat mosquitos and flies, I’m all for their ability to do so!!!


21 posted on 08/24/2016 7:46:24 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Um, since they mostly eat mosquitos and flies, I’m all for their ability to do so!!!


22 posted on 08/24/2016 7:46:26 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Dragon Flys Matter


23 posted on 08/24/2016 8:11:28 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“In fact, if the Meganeura, or giant dragonflies, of prehistory were still around...”

You would need a certain radioactive lizard to clean up the infestation.

24 posted on 08/24/2016 8:17:25 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Jimi Hendrix would disagree, as dragonflies are the best way to get to his Spanish Castle...


25 posted on 08/24/2016 8:20:55 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

And that’s how you know FR is cool. Yes. Giant Dragonflies are indeed a menace that may only be neutralized by Godzilla. We have a movie to prove it.

Freegards


26 posted on 08/24/2016 8:23:49 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Dragonflies are incredible. In addition to this article, I read on a while back that said they often eat while flying, and I think they can also fly backwards and upside down. They have a 90% success rate in hunting, as compared to lions and tigers, who have about a 50% rate of success. Most successful predators on earth.

But they are prey to the Robber fly. I've seen Robber Flies catch a couple of dragonflies.

Robber Fly, about half the size of most average Dragonflies, a little over an inch long.

Robber Fly

I've never been bitten by a dragonfly, but have had several perch on a finger for a couple of minutes. Butterflies too.

I've taken loads of pictures of them...

IMGP55485

Not easy to photograph flying, but I've been able to get a few shots.

IMGP54217

IMGP52942

IMGP50441

What is going on with Flickr? It's been incredibly sluggish the past couple of weeks...so slow it's annoying to use these days...

27 posted on 08/24/2016 9:22:50 PM PDT by Paleo Pete (Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Yes. Very interesting article. Thank you. Dragon flies are amazing showing the glory of God.


28 posted on 08/24/2016 9:27:00 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-94))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ask hummingbirds about mantis


29 posted on 08/24/2016 9:52:17 PM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Yes, that’s true, and do we know the O2 levels were higher in the past. However, a higher amount of O2 and a higher atmospheric pressure may well have gone hand in hand.

Fire?

30 posted on 08/24/2016 10:00:07 PM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

PFL


31 posted on 08/25/2016 6:52:26 AM PDT by Batman11 ( All Muslims are not terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Muslim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

The O2 level wasn’t that much higher.... and there is too much humidity and non-flammable elements in the atmosphere for it to ignite anyway.


32 posted on 08/25/2016 7:24:25 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Oxygen and Paleofires.

The level of atmospheric oxygen cannot rise indefinitely unless the frequency of forest fires becomes so excessive that plant life cannot persist. This has been pointed out by Watson et al. (27), who emphasize that fires serve as strong negative feedback against excessive O2 variation. Conversely, O2 cannot have dropped to such low values over Phanerozoic time that fires became impossible. Fossil charcoal, as evidence of paleofires, has been found for all times that trees have populated the land, and the lower limit for the production of charcoal has been estimated to be at about 13% O2 (28). By contrast, the upper limit for O2 is in dispute. On the basis of experiments on the ignition of paper strips at different oxygen levels and fuel moisture contents, Watson et al. (27) concluded that past levels of atmospheric O2 could never have risen above 25%. However, consideration of actual forest fires and the response of ecological disturbance to fires led Robinson (29) to conclude that greater O2 variation might occur and that, at any rate, paper is not a good surrogate for the biosphere. In fact, Robinson states paleobotanical evidence for a higher frequency of fire-resistant plants during the Permo-Carboniferous, supporting the idea of distinctly higher O2 levels at that time. “

http://www.pnas.org/content/96/20/10955.full

Atmospheric oxygen over Phanerozoic time


33 posted on 08/25/2016 8:04:09 AM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

“On the basis of experiments on the ignition of paper strips at different oxygen levels and fuel moisture contents, Watson et al. (27) concluded that past levels of atmospheric O2 could never have risen above 25%. However, consideration of actual forest fires and the response of ecological disturbance to fires led Robinson (29) to conclude that greater O2 variation might occur and that, at any rate, paper is not a good surrogate for the biosphere.”

Yeah, I would say he was wise to revise his upper limit:

“Analyses of the gases in these bubbles show that the Earth’s atmosphere, 67 million years ago, contained nearly 35 percent oxygen compared to present levels of 21 percent.”

http://geology.com/usgs/amber/


34 posted on 08/25/2016 8:57:48 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

That’s pretty wild. They can either hear you and/or feel the air pressure.

If one ever talks back ....... RUN!!!!


35 posted on 08/25/2016 1:44:55 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Among the large cats, cheetah is the only pure pursuit predator.

The rest make do with a combination of ambush and short-duration pursuit, or plain ambush.

I’ve seen a domestic cat (plain barnyard variety shorthair) leap straight up six feet and snatch a dragonfly out of the air.

The cat did not wind up for the move - minimal crouch, briefest lineup. The dragonfly wasn’t obviously engaged in a search or chase - just flying straight and level, here to there.

The author didn’t do badly, in insectological research. But he out of his depth on the tracking and interception of aerial targets.

The problem is indeed more complex than striking a target on the ground, from another point on the ground, but humans have been doing it for over a century - at first, with only the slimmest knowledge of flying and the most rudimentary aiming aids. Human intervention was taken out of the loop and the job was handed over to electronic brains in the 1950s ... though “brains” is too powerful a description for the simple sensors and homing circuits put into missiles at that time.

Onboard processing power has improved since then, but the rules for doing the job haven’t changed much. They haven’t had to.


36 posted on 08/25/2016 10:51:00 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson