Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

“Only 6”? How arrogant. As if these 15 years deserve more than the last 10 decades.


4 posted on 08/23/2016 10:01:05 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel

I am not surprised that only six films made since 2000 made the top 100.


6 posted on 08/23/2016 10:04:17 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: the OlLine Rebel
“Only 6”? How arrogant. As if these 15 years deserve more than the last 10 decades.

When you consider the amount of talent that would have been making movies in the '30s and '40s are now in television, and that while all the effort is into making a blockbuster, that translates into lowest common denominator and lots of focus group testing. It is like the old TV vs. movies model from the early '70s (when there were a handful of channels, and strict rules on broadcast content) were put on its head. Plus, there are just fewer movies released, and many of them, due to genre or commercial tie-ins are unlikely to be considered great. It makes sense that past decades would have more high quality, great movies.
27 posted on 08/23/2016 10:24:23 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson