Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djsunzi

More about investment (Money/time training) than population.


13 posted on 08/16/2016 3:13:24 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi

I don’t really think its about money; Indian institutions are able to spend far more on sports than most African/Asian /and even South American countries.

It’s more a question of cultural priorities; physical sports are rarely considered as a means of livelihood.

Nearly all “talented” sportspersons in India, who are identified at school level, aim to enter college under the sports quota. From there, the aim is primarily to get into government-run companies such as Air India or the Railways, which also hire under a sports quota. So, once you have a cushy 9-5 job where you get to live your sports passion by playing and winning domestic events, why stress yourself for something like the Olympics?

Two of India’s last individual medals were in shooting: one was won by a guy from a very rich family while the other shooter was an army officer: neither depended on the classical state system that I described above.


15 posted on 08/16/2016 3:32:57 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson