Hillary's Medical Records (vanity)

Twitter - HillsMedRecords ^ | August 8, 2016 | Former employee somewhere ?

[GLDNGUN]

What do our expert Freepers think? Are these documents legit?

[Freedom56v2]

You must have heard of the Benghazi committee just a month or so ago? Hillary was in the hot seat for 3 1/2 hours deflecting questions and obfuscating the truth.

No one with dementia or brain damage could have pulled that off, IMO.

---

Oh I MUST have...?!? Nice.

The Benghazi hearing was in October. The FBI hearing was last month in July...

As in previous post, What hearing are you talking about?

[Bullish]

Gee, it seems like it was just yesterday, but that’s what I was referring to.

[sockmonkey]

I agree with your take. Also, I doubt that any doctor who would not wish to end up in Fort Marcy Park would put Hillary’s name on anything that could be interpreted negatively.

[Rockingham]

The point is to try to bolster or refute authenticity by identifying who might have stolen the file. Toward that end, a scenario of theft using computer access could be researched in the computer logs and narrowed according to who had access, but that would be less so in regard to a physical theft of the file, which seems not to be the case. Those assumptions and routine office practices point toward a medical transcriptionist as having the easiest electronic access to such a file. Alternatively, look to issues in the doctor's personal life. Checks in local case files and police reports might be useful in identifying someone angry at the doctor. And, to raise an obvious possibility, with a clear path of investigation to identify a thief, a hoax is also suggested by the pristine character of the paper.

[cynwoody]

Why are her SSN and account number redacted?

If I am leaking somebody's medical records, I'd leave those items in. After all, they are essential to validating the records.

On the other hand, if I'm an ass making stuff up, I'd settle for redaction. If I don't redact, then I have to make up values, which will be quickly exposed as false. On the other hand, if I redact, then the sheeple will nod (such of them as actually look at records, redacted or not, valid or not), having been conditioned by court-ordered or FOIA disclosures.

[MIA_eccl1212]

would they pretend it doesn't exist to not give it legitimacy?

---

these are legit. if they were not, people would be in jail by now... and the clintongs won't discuss it further in the press as that would add legs the millipede of their destruction...

[LouieFisk]

"On the other hand, if I'm an ass making stuff up, I'd settle for redaction."
==
The hoaxer didn't even bother to use the right letterhead.

[maddog55]

We can only hope.

[MIA_eccl1212]

and they did not try to hide their identity.
“nothing to lose” comes to mind.
Yes, we are at that place.

[cynwoody]

Sorry to hear of Mount Kisco's financial distress.

But I won't lose any sleep over it, now being well past my bedtime.

[NYRepublican72]

I am not sure if progress notes would necessarily be on letterhead. They’d likely just be put into the file, if that particular medical group still kept paper files.

Nevertheless, I’d bet on a hoax on that twitter account.

[jmacusa]

Please God let it be so.

[jmacusa]

A neurologist.

[Enchante]

Not real. The language is not written by a real MD, it is amateur hour.

[exDemMom]

It is easy enough to generate a Word document with a letterhead containing the name and address of a real physician. Someone with a little bit of medical knowledge could pull a diagnosis off of WebMD and then write up a narrative of a patient presenting with symptoms.

What makes it superficially believable is that Hillary does display symptoms of something, so when someone describes a condition that has those symptoms, it seems plausible. But plausibility does not make it genuine.

I’m afraid that whatever is going on with Hillary’s health, we are not going to know about it. Medical records are protected by HIPAA. If that image were of a real doctor’s report, that doctor would lose her license and possibly face jail time for publicizing patient data. (Or she would suddenly suffer suicidal depression, given the Clinton crime family involvement.)

One final thing: the left is pushing this meme that Trump is “dangerous.” I think it is to distract us from the fact that whatever Hillary’s medical condition is, she is extremely volatile. And she has already caused massive mayhem in the Middle East.

[GLDNGUN]

that doctor could instantly kiss her medical career goodbye.

So if another employee illegally accessed the files and printed copies it would be the doctor's fault?

[GLDNGUN]

The hoaxer didn't even bother to use the right letterhead.

Could be. Or maybe one is for public consumption, while the other is for private records.

[GLDNGUN]

Well, that Twitter page is now gone. Whatever that means.

[meatloaf]

I agree about not having dementia. Strokes in the past, yes. She has obvious mobility issues and possibly petit mal seizures.

[Paleo Pete]

Twitter page gone now. I didn’t see it so I have no idea.

My diagnosis...other than being half past senile and bat sh#t crazy to begin with, she’ll probably live long enough to firmly entrench her disgusting daughter in government...