Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

What about increasing the legs of the attack wing so that the carrier can remain out of range of shore based anti-ship missiles? It should also mitigate to some degree the coastal diesel subs.

With the new rail gun system, the carrier screen should be able to prep the battlefield from hundreds of miles away


22 posted on 08/06/2016 7:32:10 AM PDT by Molon Labbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Molon Labbie

The rail gun trick may never be fielded as the barrels have to be replaced after each shot, I believe.


24 posted on 08/06/2016 7:36:34 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Molon Labbie

You are exactly right the navalized swing-wing f-22 would have provided stealth, range, performance, weapons load but instead we have the puny f35 that can’t do anything well. Our carriers will have to get within spitting distance to launch.


41 posted on 08/06/2016 8:36:45 AM PDT by joegoeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson