Posted on 08/02/2016 1:32:30 PM PDT by Wingy
Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers.
As we know, there are a number of ways to rig an election. Bev Harris, at blackboxvoting.org, is exploring a specific “cheat sheet” that has vast implications for the Trump vs. Hillary contest.
It’s a vote-counting system called GEMS. I urge you to dive into her multi-part series, Fraction Magic (Part-1 here). Here are key Harris quotes. They’re all shockers: “Our testing [of GEMS] shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero.”
“This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.”
“GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.”
“Instead of ‘1’ the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.”
“Weighting a race [through the use of GEMS] removes the principle of ‘one person-one vote’ to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.”
“All evidence that [rigged] fractional values ever existed [in the GEMS system] can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the [rigged] decimals will fail to reveal they were used.”
“Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers [i.e., rigging] are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.”
A contact who, so far, apparently wishes to remain anonymous states the following about the history of the GEMS system:
“The Fractional vote [rigging] portion traces directly to Jeffrey W. Dean, whose wife was primary stockholder of the company that developed GEMS. He ran the company but was prohibited from handling money or checks due to a criminal conviction for computer fraud, for which he spent 4 years in prison. Almost immediately after being released from prison he was granted intimate access to elections data and large government contracts for ballot printing and ballot processing.”
I see no effort on the part of the federal government, state governments, or the mainstream press to investigate the GEMS system or respond to Bev Harris’ extensive analysis.
It’s not as if media outlets are unaware of her. From shesource.org, here is an excerpt from her bio:
“Harris has been referred to as ‘the godmother’ of the election reform movement. (Boston Globe). Vanity Fair magazine credits her with founding the movement to reform electronic voting. Time Magazine calls her book, Black Box Voting, ‘the bible’ of electronic voting… Harris’s investigations have led some to call her the ‘Erin Brockovich of elections.’ (Salon.com)… Harris has supervised five ‘hack demonstrations’ in the field, using real voting machines. These have been covered by the Associated Press, the Washington Post, and in formal reports by the United States General Accounting Office…”
So far, her analysis of GEMS seems to be labeled “too hot to handle.” Press outlets prefer to report the slinging of mud from both Presidential candidates’ camps. Meanwhile, the actual results of the coming elections—including Congressional races—appear to be up for grabs, depending on who controls GEMS.
Ed, we can’t stop the socialist advance without DIRECT intervention.
In every state we have what is called
(1) absentee voting
(2) early voting
(3) provisional voting
How many of these opportunities can be utilized by an (assumed) legal-citizen to cast a vote in the general election this November?
I would “imagine” so
I would “imagine” so
I would “imagine” so
Oh, my goodness!
You are delving into the world of imaginary numbers!
download bkmk
I am surprised we have avoided it this long, actually.
Were the polling calls all made to land lines? If so, no one between 18-34 would be able to tell you what the ringing sound was. Pollers used to not be able to call cell phones. Wonder if that has changed? If not, that will bias the polls.
I apologize to everyone reading this post. I failed to drill down to the root and as such I have given you all an incomplete picture of the scope of the problem. http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-2/
is where you will find out the whole story. It’s long, and it doesn’t change the conclusions of the post, but it does provide details and proofs of the fraud.
They know how 1!!
The county North of me had sumtin like a 100K more voters then registered ....West lost his seat in congress thanx to the Dimwitocrats crooks there....
Make that THAN..
If 100 people vote for Hillary, and their vote is assigned a value of 1.5 -— then the machine records it as 150 votes total for Hillary.
If 100 people vote for Trump, and their vote is assigned a value of .75 -— then the machine records it as 75 votes total for Hillary.
200 total voters ==> but Hillary wins two to one.
Of course, they won’t be that obvious -— so if Hillary gets a 1.1 value bump, and Trump takes a hit with a .99 value, then the vote is 101 Hillary to 99 Trump and Hillary still wins.
There is essentially no way to confirm the results of electronically-tabulated or even cast votes. There are opportunities for fraud at literally every line of code. There are opportunities for fraud in the transmission and reception of district offices. I really see no solution that doesn’t immediately suggest its own hack.
how very dredd scott of them.
...and the stupid party will earn its name again.
I hope McCain and ryan get primaried to clarify the minds of the GOP.
She might have been on the level about the voting machine, but she definitely is a moonbat.
What about those organizations in the USA that is working hard to prevent voter fraud such as for example “True The Vote”, will such organizations be successful?
From what I read, in a word, No. Unless source code for the voting machines are perused by competent eyes. I'm thinking that the Voter ID issue that the courts are wrangling with are a head fake to distract the people from the real issue. I mean, if you made 100% sure that only verified voters voted, what does it matter if some flunky with a data stick in his pocket can alter the results nationwide in seconds.
MICHAEL:
How bad do you think it’s gonna be?
CLEMENZA:
Pretty goddamn bad. Probably all the other Families will line up against us. That’s alright — this thing’s gotta happen every five years or so — ten years — helps to get rid of the bad blood. Been ten years since the last one. You know you got to stop them at the beginning, ike they should have stopped Hitler at Munich, They should’ve never let him get away with that. They were just asking for big trouble. You know, Mike, we was all proud of you — being a hero and all. Your father, too.
[Clemenza hands Michael the gun after adjusting it. Michael points and fires the unloaded gun]
So true - and this is for all the marbles so they will definitely try to cheat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.