Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thesligoduffyflynns
We decide who gets . . . weapons.
Do we also decide who has drugs?

As long as weapons exist - and exist they will - people who are determined to have weapons “decide" that they will have them. And, emphatically, that includes people who have violent intent. As we see in Europe - where only the government-selected few can legally own weapons - somehow the most powerful weapons appear in the hands of those least likely to reserve their use to the public interest.

The current PR - and even violent physical - assault of Democrats against police is merely an example of the general point that Democrats do not want people whose intention is to use use weapons only in the public interest to have weapons.

And that legal owners of weapons overwhelmingly have that intent is manifest on its face - otherwise the vast number of legal owners of weapons - and the even larger number of legally owned weapons - would be incompatible with the low per-capita crime rate, precisely in the places where per-capita legal ownership of weapons is the highest.

And vice versa.


19 posted on 07/27/2016 3:53:27 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

all your thoughts are point on.

I see Ke$ha as a low life hanger on trying to boost her own image by affiliation of those who want to abolish the 2nd amendment.


25 posted on 07/27/2016 4:07:56 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson