Posted on 07/24/2016 1:47:34 PM PDT by MNDude
The Wikileak dump of 20,000 emails was obviously released by someone who doesn't like the DNC at the time that could most hurt them.
I'm sure there are many more than this batch of 20,000.
So, what are your predictions of when the next email release might be and what they'll reveal?
If it were released only a few days before the election, it would not touch the Democrats. Not enough time to spread the word around the DNC press.
The thing about the Wikileaks Dumps is - although EVERYONE knew the whole primary system was set up for a coronation of Madam Benghazi, the email proof means that there isn't even a shred of plausible deniability.
You made me spit up my coffee! LOL!!!
I’m waiting for the announcement from wikileaks that they were also able to hack in to the RNC server. And they found some interesting things. We should be careful with that “gloating” thing.
prolly come out the morning of her acceptance speech
Oh little Helleree, don’t you long for the olden days when it was convenient to give extraordinary and inordinate power to online YouTube videos? Oh little beotch, you ain’t seen NOTHIN’ yet.
if rnc deserves it then so be it.
Nothing to worry about. We know the RNC was working against Trump. Difference is he beat the system, unlike Bernie who gave in to it.
Trump wont be hurt at all.
I’m sorry but the mention of HIllary Clinton and the word “dump” makes me have to go to the bathroom!
The popcorn machine is getting worn out.
I think they have what the FBI does NOT have, meaning, a lot of the 30,000 or so "deleted" emails that were likely captured and archived in real time.
I am hoping they have personal stuff from the December 1, 2012 to February 15, 2013 time frame related to Hillary's foreign trips, flight itinerary, possible crash, head injury, flu, brain surgery, hospitalizations, death of a SEAL body guard and a tick-tock of Huma's activities in the same time frame (was she injured or miss work, too?).
But that is wishful thinking to resolve a bet I have with myself.
But she can't be indicted because she had a reasonable expectation that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute her for her act that were not crimes because she had no intention of being prosecuted for them. The director of the FBI agrees with here /s
It’s just too bad that most of the Hilterbeasts supporters can’t read or they might change their minds.
“He claims his next dump will have enough to get her indited”
We no longer have that capacity in the USSA.
We've heard it before - when with the shoe drop.....off of the cankle.
Yep. The fix has been in for a while.
Julian Assange had better be very careful. People who cross the clintons have a tendency to suffer unfortunate accidents.
Putin isnt about killing jihadis, he wants to restore the Russian Empire.
That is a considerable point of contention vs the US.
Trump, the isolationist, seems less likely to pay attention to his plots.
Soros probably has better security than that.
I hope they saved something for an “October Surprise” and again for three days before the election. In the old days, I would have objected to foreign interference with our elections, but this is nothing like normal times. The existence of America as a free country is threatened, and I’ll take any help I can get.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.