Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FlingWingFlyer

But . . . but . . . “open carry” was supposed to cause carnage?


6 posted on 07/23/2016 9:38:06 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: LS

“But . . . but . . . “open carry” was supposed to cause carnage?”

That old liberal lie of open carry = carnage/blood in the streets has been wrong wherever/whenever open carry came about.

Thanks for your excellent guidance and interpretation of all the faux polls during this primary.

Looking forward to your expert guidance re the faux polls out now and until November.


28 posted on 07/23/2016 10:11:05 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Nothing special re words "radical Islam"!, Nation of IsIam is just "Islam." NOI/ISIS equals murder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS
But . . .but . . .that supposition was an infallible tell that the supposer had formed opinions without serious consideration of the virtually infallible concept that whatever the subject, the greater the proportion of those affected, who take personal responsibility for the ultimate issue, as opposed to those who refuse to act responsibly, the better the result.

This pertains to economics, education, public safety, politics and just about any area of public concern. It is both logical from consideration of the psychological factors, as well as confirmed by the centuries old example of Switzerland, that a well armed gathering of responsible people was going to be safer by virtue of being well armed.

Cheers!

34 posted on 07/23/2016 10:23:47 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson