I thought it was a terrific speech, although I was dead tired, having to go to work 4 hours later.
i was stunned when it was widely derided as “dark”.
Consider the source, BunnySlippers. Those who derided/described the sspeech as 'dark' are those with a vested interest in the 'status quo'. It *would* be 'dark' to them, as if it takes root, their easy-money days are dead and gone, and a different paradigm is ascendant. Thus, they would, of a necessity consider it a dark harbinger. We, on the other hand, understand the status quo is *not* sustainable, and so consider a paradigm shift to be embraced, not shunned...
the infowarrior
It was decidedly “dark” for Hillary. She and her wife aren’t moving into the White House but the Big House.
It sure seemed like the “dark” label had been decided well in advance of the speech actually being delivered.
I heard Trump say that he would make us great, make us prosperous, make us respected. He would bring back jobs, we would make great deals, he would clean up government, and give us law and order.
And the media called this a “dark” vision.
The label makes no sense at all.
The Ministry of Propaganda had their talking points issued before he had finished his speech.
There was nothing dark about it unless you want the illegal alien inundation and corruption to continue.
Really? I was just waiting for which word they’re pick. That they decided on “dark” didn’t surprise me. They saw it that way because it steam rolled the left - I’m sure they felt like a dark cloud came over them.
Their mistake is trying to assign a label, the mainstream American saw many of their own thoughts in those speeches. Belittling them alienates voters. They just don’t understand that the standard MO is not going to work.
...next they’ll roll out the “anonymous sexual harassment accusers”. It wouldn’t surprise me if they get some woman to claim DJT raped them. Distort, lie and make shameful accusations without evidence, it’s how they roll. No surprise.