Posted on 07/22/2016 9:38:16 AM PDT by heterosupremacist
Right there in an open forum in Trinidad, Imam Muhammed Luqman Abdul-Latif proposed temporary teen marriage as a way to cure promiscuity.
What Abdul-Latif is preaching is a Shia practice called mutah, in which a man could have a wife for a short period of time while when traveling long distances. The woman needs permission from her father and a dowry is paid for the service. It is much like prostitution of women and is termed a rental of the woman.
In defining rental, the Islamic jurisprudents say: It is to gain possession of a benefit in exchange for a specified sum.
It is not traditionally a situation in which a man and woman live together like Westerners before marriage, but a temporary money contract.
According to Khola Hassan, a Sunni Muslim and spokesperson for the UK Islamic Sharia Council, there is no difference between mutah marriage and prostitution. There is a time limit on the marriage, and the mahr given as a gift [from the man to the woman] is the equivalent as a payment to a prostitute.
The practice is historically Shia, but it is also found among Sunnis. It is seen in Egypt, reportedly rising among Saudis and even in Britain.
Last year, the Islamic State executed seven women in Mosul for refusing temporary marriage.
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
Nice! I’d be married 6 months a year and divorced during football season. Vasectomy time!
Welcome to Sodom and Gomorrah.
red
The women of Islam should all send their men to Allah as they sleep.
Temporary marriage?? I thought that’s what their goats were for?
LOL! And Imam Abdul-Latif is their king.
What a religion, and what a book... You'd figure that after a very short while of reading it, and absorbing the messages - one would conclude that the god being worshipped by Islam is Satan, or one of his minions. I.e., run, don't walk, away from it as fast as you can. Yes, your crazy relatives may try to kill you - but it beats spending eternity in hell.
Or a woman who claims that her "husband" repeatedly raped her? (beating a wife who rejects sex with her husband is permitted under Islam)
Post #4 ~ Temporary marriage?? I thought thats what their goats were for? ~
I’m glad you mentioned that little tidbit ~ another feature of izlam is the bestiality factor...
Filthy murdering ba$tards the lot of 'em.
Barbarella? She was hot back then.
You don't pay a prostitute for the sex. You pay her to go away AFTER the sex.
We studied the pagan religion of Baal and Ashtoroth(sp) from the Book of Kings in church a while back. The religion stated that to appease the fertility gods you have to have lots and lots of sex as a ritual offering. Any kind of perverted sex will do and the more perverted the more it appeased the gods.
So whether it is perverted sex offerings for fertility or 6 year old wives and sodomy without love is not homosexuality and 72 virgins for martyrs, you sure can tell which religions are made up by man/Satan.
This bears a certain resemblance to “human trafficking” which all good liberals are to take a vow against.
the doctrine that marriage is a sacrament, a holy estate established and blessed by God.
I thought the supreme court threw that out last year,
or maybe it was Resident Obama...
Sounds pretty much like Pope Bergoglio’s position.
And there's the money shot right there...
That’s one I never heard of yet:
The Pope Position.
It was “Tute” or something like that, or “Toot” maybe.......
I know the primary difference between Christianity and other religions is that Christianity tells us that Christ did all the works - and we believe on Him, whereas man's religion tells man that he works for his salvation. Islam and other pagan religions also brings in this sexual perversion aspect - probably because Satan knows that man's defenses are particularly weak to this temptation. And it also is a means of attacking the family - which was God's first Church (Adam and Eve: one man and one woman acting as one flesh).
No. It was “Klute”; which still makes no more sense to me
than either “Tute” or “Toot”, or even “Poot”. I still don’t
understand “Klute”!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.