Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lulu16
"So hydrological engineering may need to take place between Canada and the United States."

Umm, no. I think the US has plenty of water, its called the Atlantic and the Pacific. Technology can make it potable.

6 posted on 06/29/2016 8:48:03 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Former Proud Canadian

One of the arguments against using sea water is that the process produces a lot of strong brine. The EPA is fretting about the damage it would do to put concentrated brine back into the coastal waters.

I’m just sitting here, rolling my eyes. Wishing that I could remind all of these wonks that this is one method of producing much-needed salt. Good quality salt, at that.

There’s no need to put the brine back in the ocean at all. Just let it evaporate, treat the minerals that are left, and keep the salt.


21 posted on 06/29/2016 9:32:40 AM PDT by Marie (The vulgarians are at the gate! MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian

The problem is not just potable water, but also water for agriculture and to support wildlife habitat. When all the demands for water are taken into account, large scale engineering projects may be the best solution, moving water from where it is in excess (Canada) to where it is needed (California). Some Canadians may scream about it at first, but compensating benefits to Canada may make such a project politically palatable and genuinely beneficial to both countries.


28 posted on 06/29/2016 10:05:35 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson