[rockrr]

I’m not sure if this could be considered an apt analogue. As I recall the lefties were complaining about who was paying for Palin’s wardrobe.

So who paid for hillary-dillary’s Armani?

[RichInOC]

We know exactly what kind of girl she is. At this point, we’re just haggling over price.

[Boardwalk]

Did Kim Jong also wear it? If the WWW becomes potus, will the Kim Jong look be in? I imagine it will be a Kim Jong look with sheets so all our new muzzle friends can wear it too.

[Mouton]

So who paid for hillary-dillary’s Armani?

Probably the Clinton Foundation.

The Clintons pay for nothing, they have short arms and deep pockets. Remember, this is the bunch that stole white house furnishings and donated used undies for a tax deduction. In the dictionary next to the word grifter we find the Clintons followed closely by the Obamas.

[SoCal Pubbie]

They criticized Nancy Reagan for her gowns, and replacing the White House china, even though it did not cost the taxpayer a dime.

[sportutegrl]

I’m not sure if this could be considered an apt analogue. As I recall the lefties were complaining about who was paying for Palin’s wardrobe.

Palin's clothes were paid for by the campaign, I believe. It is a legitimate campaign expense -- you are selling the candidate, they have to look appealing. Still, Palin would look wonderful in jeans and a t shirt, but even a 12K Armani jacket makes Hillary look like a sack of potatoes.