I want to correct one thing I posted yesterday. Namely, I said Mrs. Clinton was not among the ranks of the ultra rich. In fact, we don’t know whether she is or not. While she was head of State, six billion dollars went mission. One thing we know, it didn’t evaporate into thin air.
Now who in a position of power at the State Dept, at that time, has a long and proven track record of robbing America/the tax payers blind? Who’s dismal record as SoS is partly due to the fact that she focussed more on acquiring wealth than on matters of state?
Even if Mrs. Clinton had to disperse a billion to underlings, so as to make them criminally complicit/ensure their silence, that leaves five billion for the Secretary. From what I understand, that still doesn’t put her in Hitler’s league, but A, it’s not chickenfeed, and B, she’s not done yet.
(Note: Switzerland is no longer the only country that shields vast deposits from public scrutiny.)
Is $6 Billion now such a trivial amount that no one cares where it went and to whom?
There is a distinct pattern to Clinton scandals and criminal behavior but there are never held accountable, always a pass, which has helped contribute to the deterioration of enforcement of Black Letter Law.