Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter

Can’t say that I can argue with any of your points. My only point is that Hitler did end up being incredibly wealthy. Most people seem to be unaware of that fact. And I do think that many of his followers were motivated by the opportunity to get rich.


44 posted on 06/10/2016 3:25:06 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: hanamizu

The op compared Hitler to Hillary, not Hillary to Hitler’s followers. While I don’t have one good thing to say about Hitler, it is a fact that he early on centered his life around something bigger than himself—making Germany the lone superpower. There’s no indication that Mrs. Clinton has ever embraced anything bigger than herself. From that POV, there’s a certain irony at play. Hillary’s goal is money [even what power she’s acquired, she utilized to enlarge her portfolio] and while she’s certainly accumulated money, she’s far from the ranks of the ultra-rich.

Hitler’s goal was a supremist Germany, yet as you pointed put, his wealth accrual put Mrs. Clinton’s to shame. Add to that the fact that without her HINO’s political success, Mrs. Clinton’s own money making ability would have been limited at best, and the contrast is complete.


46 posted on 06/10/2016 3:42:20 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson