Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

Well then the next time you get a court judgment against you at least you won’t think it’s anything to worry about. Is that tech blogger wisdom or something?


37 posted on 05/26/2016 8:28:24 PM PDT by Pelham (Trump/Tsoukalos 2016 - vote the great hair ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
Any tech links or are you anti-tech or just anti-Apple. As far I can see from neutral sources, Apples licenses tons of patents. Here's the patent they are being sued over:

A plurality of computer nodes communicate using seemingly random Internet Protocol source and destination addresses. Data packets matching criteria defined by a moving window of valid addresses are accepted for further processing, while those that do not meet the criteria are quickly rejected. Improvements to the basic design include (1) a load balancer that distributes packets across different transmission paths according to transmission path quality; (2) a DNS proxy server that transparently creates a virtual private network in response to a domain name inquiry; (3) a large-to-small link bandwidth management feature that prevents denial-of-service attacks at system chokepoints; (4) a traffic limiter that regulates incoming packets by limiting the rate at which a transmitter can be synchronized with a receiver; and (5) a signaling synchronizer that allows a large number of nodes to communicate with a central node by partitioning the communication function between two separate entities.

There's nothing that Apple would need in that list of stuff.

38 posted on 05/26/2016 8:52:33 PM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson