I’ve been guilty of a fair amount of speculation myself over time, and been severely chastised for it. Each time, I’ve done my best to explain my reasons and provide what evidence I could get my hands on.
I know how frustrating it is, when no one can see what I think I can see.
But I have never been guilty of creating graphics from bits and pieces of disjointed visuals and then badgering and harassing the audience by telling them they are blind idiots, or criminal conspirators.
Our erstwhile FRiends are going to have to do what we ask. It’s that simple.
Show whose body the hand is attached to.
Show the dummy sitting next to Jacob Key.
And I’ll take it as a bonus if I’m shown the dummy exiting the aircraft. Maybe it went down when the plane sank and dummy and Elvis are down there sleeping with the fishes...
Maybe the dummy didn’t “sleep with the fishes” but was actually in the infant lifejacket with an intact CO2 cartridge that the USCG claims was the Fuddy they picked out of the water. The video shows us Fuddy’s lifejacket’s CO2 cartridges were both punctured so it can’t have been her. So what was it? Why does the USCG’s description of the Fuddy they pulled out of the water not match what we see in the video of Fuddy in the water?
What DID match the description of what the USCG retrieved from the water? It had to be something that looked like Fuddy. What was it?
Just wow. I hadn't pictured the great FN stooping to making things up out of whole cloth! I certainly never called anyone around here an idiot or a criminal conspirator. Oops, maybe you're saying that a DU reference is tantamount to a "criminal conspirator" reference. You may know more about that than I. Thanks for letting us know!
Our erstwhile FRiends are going to have to do what we ask. It’s that simple.
Just wow! I hope you can hear yourself. It seems you're into making demands. That's quite the Leftist way of behaving, isn't it?