Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
My only question is if Harold Henry Schultz is supposed to be the one not named why did he not speak out? He didn't pass away until 1995, 50 years after the event.

If true, probably for a number of complex reasons. I couldn't tell you who's who in that photo, for one thing. If anyone were to come out and say they were in that photo years ago, how would they prove it? Especially after the US Marine Corps told the world who was in that photo? Who, even with the truth on their side, would dare challenge them without ironclad proof? And it might not be enough to prove that they were in the photo. They'd be expected to out the guy who wasn't in it, too, and that would be another burden of proof.

But imagine if, too, after the end of 50 years, they could look back and say it was more than enough honor for one man to be a US Marine, who fought on Iwo Jima (and had proof enough of that), didn't let his buddies down, made it home to live a good life in the greatest nation on earth, and didn't have to make a big deal about it afterwards.

22 posted on 05/02/2016 5:04:10 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS

My thoughts about it which you touched on is those Marines and one sailor were representative of all those who fought and sacrificed much, some sacrificed all for our country.

In my view it should be left at that and that this investigation is not needed.


23 posted on 05/02/2016 5:11:59 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson