Posted on 05/01/2016 3:39:46 PM PDT by Morgana
That’s it, Target can KMA goodbye.
.Then This Happens (VIDEO)
A video happened? WHAT happened?
It was a form of protest. Not necessarily the most subtle one or one to garner much sympathy, granted.
At the risk of using a logical fallacy, leftists have done much worse to protest what they think of as unfairness and injustice, but the mainstream media is fine with them. These guys, being open Christians and protesting a detrimental societal change, won’t get such good coverage.
I hope you have a daughter.
We don’t shop at Target anymore, we have one near our house, its a City Target, no longer will we go to their store..this is absolutely the STUPIDEST move they could have ever done..they are inviting sexual predators they mind as well put a sign on the bathroom door saying “All sex perverts welcome” you are going to see, mark my words, a woman, a child will get raped in one of these bathrooms and you watch the lawsuits start piling up
Research.
Was Target policing who went in which restroom before all this? I think not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They should have kept their mouths shut then, instead of trying to offend a majority of their customer base by jumping on the latest bandwagon to label traditionalists as bigots.
I’m with Trump, but not on this one.
Yep, but Target is even stupider than that. They have inadvertently advertised their stores as pervert-friendly. Now any sicko male can decide - on the spur of the moment - that he now identifies as a female, and can enter a Target woman's restroom.
I really can’t believe it. It is a plaintiffs lawyers dream!! You talk about a “TARGET” . And insurance will NOT cover that because it is an illegal act in 95% of the states!!! They promoted an illegal act. I predict their stock falls 50% by next friday. Nobody could be so so stupid !!Perverts in the women’s toilet areas— UCMTU!! ONE RAPE!!!
OMG , I never saw that. My God, this is the greatest corporate suicide in history. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?
Meh. Maybe they’ll start carrying merchandise specifically for perverts. Their San Francisco stores, especially any of them near Folsom Street, should be doing a booming business.
It’ll REALLY be booming when the muzzies invade. Then they’ll have to stock rugs, swords, and baskets for Friday night at the mosques.
CRAZY HASSAN SAYS GET YOUR CAMELS AND CAMEL ACCESSORIES HERE! CRAZY HASSAN MAKES CRAAAAAZY DEALS! SLIGHTLY USED CAMELS, CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP!
Let me predict that little Annie is going to get her A$$ sued off beyond policy limits!!! She better duck and cover quickly.
It is not just bathrooms. It is having a guy in the changing room with women, and if his behavior is rude, salacious, etc, they don’t do a thing.
I’ve been sexually harassed by these mentally ill men, (80%+ women, less than a quarter have the male plumbing removed, and most retain heterosexual orientation, hence the “lesbian” designation for the guy who says he’s a girl).
And where there is a “tolerance” policy, it is treated as an argument between two women.
I caught that, too. I’d be willing to bet that if confronted about this inconsistency, Anne M. Mulcahy would assert how this policy protects the youths who are questioning their sexuality from discrimination or possible violence. Only liberals cannot see their foolishness or hypocrisy.
Maye he should have walked into the restroom and stood there?
After all who could have said anything then???
The Enemy is within and until we deal with that Enemy we will Never be able to Deal with the Enemy’s outside the Nation.
First, note that the father narrating the video referred to the so-called right to privacy at 2:15 in the video. The problem is that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect privacy in the context of PC transgender bathrooms. This is regardless that activist justices concocted the so-called constitutional right to pirvacy which they later used to help justify the likewise PC “right" to have an abortion.
But even if privacy was a constitutionally enumerated right, it remains that the Supreme Court had clarified in United States v. Cruikshank that the states have obligated only themselves and federal government, not private citizens or businesses (my wording), to respect constitutionally enumerated rights.
On the other hand, just as with state power to prohibit abortions, power which is now wrongly ignored by institutionally indoctrinated, pro-abortion activist judges and justices, the state that this video was made in might have bona-fide 10th Amendment-protected privacy laws which address privacy in customer restrooms at places of businesses, privacy laws which Target could be violating.
Insights, corrections welcome.
Exactly my point
It’s the other way around. They went to Target with the intent on attacking the bathroom policy,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.