Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
EternalVigilance: "One could say that the War commenced with the attack on Mr. Sumner, not with the attack on Fort Sumter."

But one should not, unless one is using the word "war" in a metaphorical sense, as in "war on women", or "war on poverty", "war on belly-fat", etc.
Insurrection, rebellion, domestic violence, lawlessness, vigilantism, etc... sure.
But strictly, war is an action between sovereign states, and is often officially declared as such.

Imho, that's the reason why the Confederacy on May 6, 1861 formally declared war on the United States, or in their own language, "recognized" that war existed.
Formally declaring war is the act of an independent state, intended to distinguish itself from accusations of being mere "rebellion" or "insurrection".
Rebels don't declare war, and neither do states formally declare war on rebellions.
But states do declare war on each other, hence the Confederacy's action of May 6, 1861.

The United States officially treated it all as rebellion, and never formally declared war.

72 posted on 05/25/2016 6:30:46 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

Well, be that as it may, I’m betting the Senator felt that war had been declared and enacted upon him.

And this particular outrage certainly had a significant effect on later events.


73 posted on 05/25/2016 6:49:31 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson