When people want to live where living is expensive (because so many people want to live there), conservatism/capitalism dictates that you let property owners decide how to address the potential value: either raise rent (and perhaps improve units to attract & justify the money), or divide & modify the property so more people are willing to pay to use it - which may mean making tiny apartments or manufactured homes.
You may not like it, but - not being the property owner nor the renter/buyer - it’s none of your d@mn business. And that’s the point.
Sometimes consequences of Right & Left philosophies intersect. That doesn’t mean the point of intersection is wrong. The real question, per your concern, is whether people will be punished for instead opting to MOVE somewhere where they can get bigger properties for lower costs.
“You may not like it, but - not being the property owner nor the renter/buyer - it’s none of your d@mn business. And that’s the point.”
______________
I assume when you say “you”, you are speaking generically, and not to me.
My post has nothing whatsoever to do with trailer parks or mobile homes.
It has to do with globalization and the push to force people into high density urban centers. I don’t care if they put in a free bike path and zone it so I can live in a pup tent, or in my car—no thanks.