It’s not climate change. It’s just weather. The weather changes constantly and on long and short cycles superimposed on each other. When “scientists” talk about climate change models the problem is with the s. If they had a working model (singular)that could be used to predict results, then I would believe in a vast, encompassing change in long term cycles. But they have to tailor a new model every time they want to predict something because the last model is now unable to explain the results they are seeing.
If the computer models were accurate they would be able to run them in reverse to show us what the weather was. If they can’t do that with known data (and they can’t) then why would anyone believe they could forecast the future?