Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: georgiegirl
Jamie DuPree is a democrat, isn’t he?

No, he will not take sides on anything. That way he can sell his news service to both sides. I like him more than hannity lately.

73 posted on 04/19/2016 4:31:42 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: georgiegirl; mountainlion

“Jamie DuPree is a democrat, isn’t he?”

“No, he will not take sides on anything. That way he can sell his news service to both sides. I like him more than Hannity lately.”


The fact that he habitually refuses to take sides does not mean he is not a Democrat (or Republican, for that matter); the one has nothing to do with the other.
I have tried to find real substance about this man in the past, with little success. He is very good at hiding himself, as far as I can tell.
I have virtually stopped listening to any of the supposedly conservative radio hosts. Whether or not they try to be ostensibly objective about an issue or candidate in the moment, when the time comes, they all fall in line with the RNC establishment by obediently cajoling, lecturing, and threatening We The People into being submissive sheep to be sheared once again. (Follow the money - always.)
The strength (comparatively) of Hannity is that he gets many guests, most of whom are better than he is; the downside is that he continually trumpets people like Karl Rove (”The Architect”) and Jamie Dupree (”The Most Connected Man...”).
To hear Dupree, nothing that happens in DC is anything more than a difference in “tactics”; there is no ethical right or wrong - about anything. He is apparently as much a political animal as the people upon whom he purports to comment. I cannot stand to listen to him; if I bother with Hannity at all (which is rarely), I turn him off if Dupree comes on.
My take after years of listening:
Limbaugh: the most clever and most respectful; attempts to seem impartial when he is not.
Hannity: the most obtuse; probably also the most sincere.
Levin: a devious lawyer; extremely condescending, hypocritical and abusive.
Savage: the only one possibly not a creature of the establishment; egomaniacal and erratic, and, like Levin, extremely condescending and abusive, but occasionally worthwhile.
I do not begrudge them their success or money; I begrudge them my precious time. More and more, I trust to my own knowledge and wisdom, and rely on alternative media for my information.


85 posted on 04/19/2016 5:17:14 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson