[Rashputin]

So, you can't answer how a creation of Congress, the EPA, running amok is the same thing as a major change to the Constitution that required an Amendment because it altered the original, clear, statement of how the government was to be organized.

Keep changing subjects all you like, it doesn't alter your original fallacy one little bit nor does it explain away the fact that Ted Cruz is just one more Harvard Lawyer making a lot of promises with no track record of ever accomplishing a thing.

[tacticalogic]

So, you can't answer how a creation of Congress, the EPA, running amok is the same thing as a major change to the Constitution that required an Amendment because it altered the original, clear, statement of how the government was to be organized.

I did explain it. If you don't understand the original intent of the Constitution well enough to understand how they both violate it, I can't fix that for you.

Keep changing subjects all you like, it doesn't alter your original fallacy one little bit nor does it explain away the fact that Ted Cruz is just one more Harvard Lawyer making a lot of promises with no track record of ever accomplishing a thing.

If you want to talk about Cruz, don't pretend to want to talk about the original intent of the Constitution. You aren't good enough to make that work.