Posted on 04/12/2016 9:57:08 PM PDT by cba123
ROME, New York (AP) — Texas Sen. Ted Cruz blasted rival Donald Trump in a radio interview Tuesday, accusing the Republican front-runner of being a bully, inciting violence and using dirty tricks to intimidate voters and delegates, as Trump continued to rail against a nominating system he says is crooked and rigged.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/cruz-accuses-trump-threatening-delegates-185544728--election.html
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
St. Ted whining.
Cruz yammers on and on about Trump all day, every day, and hasn’t talked about anything else in weeks.
Cruz - “I’m gonna hit you high and low and in all sorts of unsavory ways. If you respond in any way, I’m gonna act all indignant and whine. That’s how I roll.”
Cruz yammers on and on about Trump all day, every day, and hasn’t talked about anything else in weeks.
Yeah, I noticed that in his interview with Hannity yesterday. It was 100% issue and substance free. Just one slime bucket talking point attack after another on Trump.
“Who post contact info on people...”
the Denver newspaper
FWIW, delegates in Indiana are being threatened by Trump supporters. In reality, this probably has as much to do with Donald Trump as the shenanigans delegates are pulling in some states has to do with Ted Cruz.
Haven’t seen folks on this site so unhinged since Karl Rove was creating hurricanes.
Do you have any Attacks on Trump that date after 911, Paris,California and the massive Illegal crimes waves? Even people like you can change when faced with such things.
Now you explain how Cruz is supposed to be good for America when hes backed up his Wife’s North American union Globalist agenda every chance he has had? The trees you are focused on are part of a much bigger forest. None of your issues matter if Cruz is able to complete the CFR plan for a NAU.
Stone is not part of the Trump campaign. He was fired last August precisely because he is a loose cannon.
The media keeps interviewing him because he says off the wall things that get ratings. I’m sure if Cruz gets the nomination the MSM will find plenty of objectionable supporters of his to interview to make him look bad, too.
The info was posted by Cruz and the GOPe, its public record. Trump had nothing to do with it. They put it in the paper.
Real world time. This is 2016. There are firms that do nothing else but research on people and have tools like facial recognition etc now. Every vulnerable delegate is going to be known and where they are and who they meet with in the normal course of business. There will be profiles and background research done on them before they get to Cleavland by a bunch of different parties.
Lawyers do this all the time with prospective jury pools in high dollar case for example. So there is no secrecy or hidden delegates. Nor is it reasonable to presume there is. Too much money and power is at stake.
So if you are a delegate and there is anything in your past good or bad that can be used to flip your stated position its going to be out there for the parties and governments who have a dog in this hunt.
Great JOB!
Bookmarked
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted for the Corker amendment.
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act.
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted for the TPP enabling TPA.
Cruz is a F R A U D
Amen.
You can say that again (I think I just did!)
Hmmm... Let's see who voted against that bill - Hatch, McConnell, Collins, Coats, Cochran, Corker, McCain, Portman, Roberts, Sanders, Baldwin; yep, quite a list of "constitutional conservatives" you got there. By the way, that was the bill that STOPPED the NSA from doing bulk collection of phone records. No constitutional conservative could support that, could they?
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted for the TPP enabling TPA.
So every person who voted for a version of TPA over the past 40 years was not a constitutional conservative? How about a president that would sign such a bill? Was Reagan not a constitutional conservative?
You need new talking points - these are just silly and reveal your ignorance more than anything else.
Compelling points. Bears repeating:
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted for the Corker amendment.
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act.
There is no way a constitutional-conservative would have voted for the TPP enabling TPA.
~~~
I’ll add one more:
There’s no constitutional conservative who would oppose Trump more than the GOP-e.
Exactly.
I think every constitutional conservative should oppose Trump - if you don't, I question if you are a constitutional conservative! Heck, even most of the Trump supporters have stopped claiming Trump is conservative!
Cruz is flailing for attention, Trump is running circles around him.
“So every person who voted for a version of TPA over the past 40 years was not a constitutional conservative? “
I am talking about section 10 & 12 of the current one, you aSS wipe. Millions of American jobs will disappear. READ them!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.