I’ll say it again
3: that we’re not despicable rumor mongerers with filthy minds and are simply waiting to see if there is any actual evidence before deciding that he is guilty-
we don;t make up crap about begin ‘evasive’ After he’s already addressed the issue several times, denied the affairs, after she has denied the affairs, etc etc etc- We don’t demand peoepl jump through all kinds of ignorant hoops in order to ‘prove they are innocent’ only to ignore their hoops jumping and demand they jump through more hoops after they do in order to ‘prove they are innocent’ ad nauseum
we simply allow the evidence to surface- or not- We don’t presume guilt before evidence is available- that’s not how the justice system works- an for good reason because it leads to slimy assumptions and speculations and false accusations when people get into a despicable lynch mob mentality-
“We don’t demand peoepl jump through all kinds of ignorant hoops in order to ‘prove they are innocent’ only to ignore their hoops jumping and demand they jump through more hoops after they do in order to ‘prove they are innocent’ ad nauseum”
Ted Cruz did precisely that when he accused, tried, convicted, and demanded the punishment of Corey Lewandowski. You also seem to deny the voters are supposed to judge a candidate for the candidate’s reputation and characteristics, and not just because a prosecutor has not yet been able to procure enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict.