Posted on 03/30/2016 2:32:03 PM PDT by drewh
A woman named Deborah Palfrey was accused of operating an illegal escorting empire in the nation’s capitol, and though she insisted everything she did was legal and by the books, she couldn’t prove it because she never kept names or records of her clients. All she had was phone records and those that were released made for good news fodder but couldn’t save her from a possible prison sentence of over 50 years. She killed herself in 2008.
But there are some records that weren’t released. A court order has barred Palfrey’s former lawyer and the current custodian of the records, Montgomery Blair Sibley, from releasing those mysterious records, but Sibley has been hinting lately that he just might defy the gag order.
Sibley seems to believe that he has a few phone numbers in his collection that could have major relevance on the 2016 presidential election. Maddow explained it like this:
Now, though, something has happened. We don’t know what, exactly, but something has happened that has made that lawyer not only want to release those old records from the D.C. Madam case, [but] he now says he plans to release those old records from the D.C. Madam case despite that still-existing court order. He says he has a right to release those records under the First Amendment. He also says he has a duty to release those records because it is now in the national interest that he do so and that he do so quickly. This is kind of amazing.
He has filed a motion with the federal court in D.C. that issued the gag order. The court “kicked it right back to him.” Sibley has now appealed that rejection in an appeals court and filed a motion with the United States Supreme Court because, in his words, “time is of the essence” when it comes to releasing phone numbers that have a particular bearing on the upcoming election.
His motion with the Supreme Court reads, “Expedited resolution of this Application is incumbent upon this Court.” He wrote that by ignoring his application, the Supreme Court would, in hindsight, appear to favor one candidate over another. Then, in a footnote, he threatened to release the records of 815 clients regardless of the Court’s decision, so it appears we will be finding out what bearing those records have on our current presidential candidates soon enough.
Sounds like he is sitting on a goldmine, but what could it be? Could he corroborate the rumors that Ted Cruz has been unfaithful to Heidi Cruz? When The Enquirer ran their piece this weekend, they did allude to there being “a hooker” among his five mistresses.
A Madame, with a list in DC, committed suicide. Yeah, I believe that.
I was thinking more of Ryan, Jeb and the establishment men. And perhaps Little Rubio, well I won’t go there.
Bernie Sanders NEVER HAD SEX!
No. Bernie had sex with the entire state of Vermont.
That is the kind of talk that gets one Breitbarted.
-PJ
LOL
He was working for the state of Texas at that time, so doubtful.
The entire planet is NOT ready to imagine Kasich junping around with nothing but his daddy's mailbag and postal pith helmet waving his arms and yelling,
"Who dah man baby, who dah mail man? KASICH DELIVERS BABY! YEAH!"
I totally agree-and why is he being constrained from releasing the info now, since the “DC Madam” has been dead since 2008? I can’t imagine that her family would be embarrassed after all this time-sounds like a bunch of horndog politicians trying to cover their asses to me...
Publish those records-it is probably worth a book deal, at the very least...
I think before that, he was working in DC for Bush though.
Cruz was not yet elected to the Senate, and Trump never has spent much time in D.C.
******************
Ted Cruz was Texas Solicitor General 2003-2008. As such he spent
time in DC as he argued cases before the US Supreme Court.
Bwahahahaha ... renews a faith in womanhood!
Well, maybe we should be asking Carly. I just received an urgent e-mail from Cruz saying he needs $219,326 because he’s short of what he needs for his FEC deadline. Will I do my part right now—before tomorrow night’s deadline! Looks like maybe the $500,000 isn’t the only installment.
Is it another candidate? Donald Trump? Bernie Sanders? Perhaps their handlers?
A little dishonest to of a Trump supporter to include the speculation that it may be Cruz related and sandbag the speculation that it may also be Trump related, don't you think?
She died in ‘08. Cruz was not yet elected to the Senate, and Trump never has spent much time in D.C.
Are you ready for a John Kasich Sex Scandal, America?
Didn’t Cruz go before the Supreme Court several times? I bet he was in DC fairly regularly. As a ‘mover and shaker’ I’m sure someone would of slipped him a number, if he asked.
Come to think of it, it wasn’t Heidi asking for money.
because Ted’s hooker already has a blog? https://avengersocial.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/interview-with-a-candy-wrapper-the-lollipop-edition/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.