[w1andsodidwe]

Seems to me that the welfare should be for those who cannot work, not for those who will not work. Why is the world would you think any differently. Cannot understand how you don't understand that.

Also, technology is not an enemy to be taken from children it is something that can be harnessed to make them even better. Years ago my friend would tell me how smart their children/grandchildren where when it comes to technology. I would always ask if they were designing technology or just good at turning stuff off and on. There is a difference, you know.

I suggest conservatism means leaving people alone to live their lives.

[Wallace T.]

One simple, though radical, step would be to rpeal all legislation passed after 1930. I say 1930 because the Congressional election that year voted in a Democrat congress. Also void all Supreme Court decisions made after 1939 when the anti-New Deal court majority dissolved. Immediately you will have a very limited government.

[Pollster1]

Seems to me that the welfare should be for those who cannot work, not for those who will not work.

Good advice, and I've heard the same sentiment before: 2 Thess 3:10 "For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat." Faith and logic both tell me that this is the most loving option. God is love, so we know He told us this out of compassion for the perpetual problem of those who "will not work". Logically, I object to the money wasted on welfare, but I object far more to the lives wasted because people who choose (rather than need) welfare throw away their time doing nothing that gives them a sense of purpose.