Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Popman
I think it's a moot one because your main point seems to be a - loyalty - issue...

No no no no no. It is a constitutional issue. Letting an openly foreign born candidate ascend to the office of POTUS opens the door for even further subversion of the rule later. For three elections in a row, we have had increasingly questionable candidates running for POTUS. Our constitution is CLEARLY being subverted and I WON'T BE PART OF IT.

57 posted on 02/05/2016 4:52:33 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: RC one
No no no no no. It is a constitutional issue.

That is still a murky issue until the SCOTUS rules on it, if ever....Under US current law both are eligible...

That may not line up with your interpretation of who is eligible but it's where we are today..

Letting an openly foreign born candidate ascend to the office of POTUS opens the door for even further subversion of the rule later.

I find midly humorous you are worried about potential future candidates undermining/subversion the Constitution when we have two candidates (the Criminal or Marxist) who have zero regard for the Constitution...

Still thinking about my question in the previous post...?

60 posted on 02/05/2016 5:04:00 AM PST by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson