[knarf]

Are you suggesting we do nothing about illegal infiltration ?
What's the social and economical impact with THAT ?

I would trust (at THIS point in our history) .. the proponent of free enterprise to select the least intrusive justices to American wealth building

Politicians make laws ... and we don't need no more steenking laws

I wonder if Trump is on the platform carrying ?

[monocle]

What I was questioning was the unqualified plea to get something done. I am totally opposed to illegal immigration and amnesty, but if getting something done means amnesty or other concessions I would settle for no action by Congress with the president strictly enforcing existing laws.

"Politicians make laws ... and we don't need no more steenking laws". But you were pleading to get something done which in our country means politicians must act.

I don't understand what you attempting to convey in regard to your specific reference to Trump.

I am first and most of all a devout follower of smaller and less intrusive government in both social and economic matters.