Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IBD editorial writer

The way i saw it whoever has won Iowa in years past usually failed to become POTUS.


5 posted on 02/02/2016 4:25:34 AM PST by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Daniel Ramsey

McCain finished fourth in IA in 2008 and Romney finished in a tie with Santorum in 2012.

They both went on to lose in November.


7 posted on 02/02/2016 4:27:39 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Most have not.

The big reason is that the winner usually spends so much time there, that they have no clue as to how to repeat the win in a completely different part of the country.


9 posted on 02/02/2016 4:28:09 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Then why do all the candidates “have to win” Iowa? I’ve never understood it.


57 posted on 02/02/2016 5:05:19 AM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel Ramsey

but not always.......you should ask why......why did Huck and Santorum fail after winning Iowa? Because their candidacies were doomed from the start by being a niche only candidacy.

That’s not the case with Cruz, Trump or Rubio. This year, the niche candidates hardly registered. Three candidates with appeal in several voter sectors dominated. Yeah, I know, “why” is troubling notion for some....but it’s damned important.


70 posted on 02/02/2016 5:18:18 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson