Skip to comments.
South Carolina Just Outlawed Something Islamists Cannot LIVE without
newsfoxes.com ^
| 01/30/2016
| Danny Gold
Posted on 01/31/2016 9:08:42 PM PST by Silentgypsy
South Carolina just passed a new bill that will ruin any plan Islamists may have had about dominating the US. In a vote of 68 to 42, the South Carolina House agreed to block Islamic Sharia Law from ever being acknowledged in their state. The new legislation is explained as âa bill to amend the code of laws of South Carolinaâ¦so as to prevent a court or other enforcement authority from enforcing foreign law including, but not limited to, Sharia Law in this state from a forum outside of the United State or its territories under certain circumstance.â
(Excerpt) Read more at newsfoxes.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: islam; outlawsharia; sharia; shariaillegal; sharialaw; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: stars & stripes forever
The article stated that the bill passed in the House.
21
posted on
01/31/2016 10:23:54 PM PST
by
Silentgypsy
(Mind your atomic bonds.)
To: eastforker
22
posted on
01/31/2016 10:25:26 PM PST
by
Silentgypsy
(Mind your atomic bonds.)
To: El Cid
Thank you for the learning opportunity. I had to look it up.
23
posted on
01/31/2016 10:27:36 PM PST
by
Silentgypsy
(Mind your atomic bonds.)
To: eastforker
Oh come on now, why do you think?
24
posted on
01/31/2016 11:11:04 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Well don’t let your son be the only smart one in the family. You have to admit it was a nice back handed compliment.
25
posted on
01/31/2016 11:13:56 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: Silentgypsy
26
posted on
01/31/2016 11:14:15 PM PST
by
Yaelle
To: Candor7
...That law should be passed in every state in the union, and the territories of the United States. A good start. But outlawing the death cult itself would be better imo.
27
posted on
01/31/2016 11:29:12 PM PST
by
Fred Nerks
(FAIR DINKUM!)
To: Silentgypsy
Let me guess? Left hands?
28
posted on
02/01/2016 12:23:38 AM PST
by
higgmeister
( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! Trump 2016!)
To: Silentgypsy
Making the state safe for little boys, camels and goats. Boy are the Democrats and Moslem fundamentalist pissed and horny.
To: Silentgypsy
Texas should follow. Have to call Gov Gregg (cutie) Abbott up.
30
posted on
02/01/2016 12:34:58 AM PST
by
patriot08
(4th geneneration Texan (girl type))
To: Silentgypsy
Texas should follow. Have to call Gov Gregg (cutie) Abbott up.
31
posted on
02/01/2016 12:34:58 AM PST
by
patriot08
(4th geneneration Texan (girl type))
To: Silentgypsy
It still has to pass the state senate and then signed by the liberal Indian governor.
To: Mr Apple
We all know that these 42 are slimy delusional obama demorats. No doubt about it.
All forty Democrat legislators voting as a block AGAIN and the two Republicans from Pickens County (Clemson University).
Yes, it IS of concern to us.
To: Silentgypsy
Islam is fundamentally at odds with any form of self-government. Case in point: Obama's executive orders. (His orders are consistently diametrically opposed to Christian freedoms.)
34
posted on
02/01/2016 5:59:21 AM PST
by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
To: Silentgypsy
I hope and pray other states do the same.
35
posted on
02/01/2016 6:01:35 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
To: eastforker
The biggest question is why did 42 reps oppose this bill.
Forty-two democrats in the legislature?
36
posted on
02/01/2016 6:17:37 AM PST
by
RobinOfKingston
(Just what is the difference between a "centrist democrat" and a "moderate republican?")
To: Silentgypsy
"a bill to amend the code of laws of South Carolinaâ¦so as to prevent a court or other enforcement authority from enforcing foreign law including, but not limited to, Sharia Law in this state from a forum outside of the United State or its territories under certain circumstance." The devil is in the detail. Under what circumstances would it not be prevented?
To: Silentgypsy
It will go to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court will find a way to invalidate it.
To: Candor7
39
posted on
02/01/2016 8:56:16 AM PST
by
sergeantdave
( If not you, who? If not now, when?)
To: DoodleDawg; Verginius Rufus
Your observations are among the reasons that confidence in the motivation of our officials is waning.
40
posted on
02/01/2016 8:31:44 PM PST
by
Silentgypsy
(Mind your atomic bonds.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson