Posted on 01/31/2016 3:21:02 PM PST by blueunicorn6
I think that a lot of Democrats don't understand what it is that Hillary has done wrong. Most Democrats don't have experience handling secret material. Most Democrats are not experts about computers or networks.
They do know what Anne-mail is, but they see it in the context of what they know. They get e-mails. Hillary got e-mails. So what? Remember, they have no experience in dealing with communications security.
Let's say LeBron James gets mad at an opposing player and hits him in the mouth in a game. That would be an intentional flagrant foul. LeBron would be penalized. He did it on purpose and it could have seriously injured the other player. LeBron would be tossed out of the game.
What if Kevin Love did it? Would it make a difference that he is physically different from LeBron? Nope.
What if a female player did it? It wouldn't matter that she's a female. It's still a foul and she would be penalized.
This is like what Hillary has done. She did commit an intentional flagrant foul with this e-mail business. She did it on purpose and it could get many Americans killed.
Hillary should be kicked out of the game.
Only, she did even worse.
What if the opposing team contacted LeBron and said they would pay him to tell them what rooms his teammates were sleeping in so they could go and cut their throats. And LeBron told them and took the money.
LeBron would go to prison!
But this is what Hillary has done. She committed an intentional flagrant foul and then sold us, her teammates, out for some bucks.
This is why Hillary needs to go to prison.
Wouldn’t it be easier to list the things that witch as done right?
What she’s done wrong? Let’s start with :Having gotten out of bed that morning, ready to play the part of “Happy Wife”.
Were we really interested in security, NO dum- bulb-crat would qualify for even Confidential level security...let alone SAP-level material.
Democrats don’t CARE what it is that Hillary has done wrong
One thing I am unfamiliar with though is: Anne-mail. What is that?
Sure.
I’ve listed them below:
Your list matches mine exactly.What a coincidence.
It’s what FLOTUS would be sending if 2012 had turned out differently.
There isn’t enough data in the world for all her wrongdoings.
Here it is, hot off the press.
The Complete Book of All of Hillary Clinton's Accomplishments.
Morons, it’s simple. She lied, cheated, compromised national security, and lied some more. Common sense. But then, we can’t expect liberals to comprehend the absence of ethics within the Obama and Clinton teams, and the impact it has on foreign relations and our security.
Here it is:
.
You have to start at rapist enabler then look at the rest of her worthless life.
I agree, they think at most that she bent some silly rules from State or Defense Departments that would have helped evil Republicans disrupt her plans to save the planet.
They don’t understand that many of our biggest secrets have been compromised. They are in the hands of the Chinese, the Russians, and who know else. This is the biggest compromise of national security since the loss of Atomic bomb secrets and John Anthony Walkers theft of nuclear submarine command and control procedures. Aaron Burr was just a dreamer compared to Hillary.
That's the crux of it right there.
I've had debates with Liberals over the years. It's very frustrating, so I gave up and no longer do it.
Liberals operate on an entirely different frequency than the rest of the world. In their minds, they live in a literal alternate reality.
All the facts, evidence, reason, logic, etc. in the world matters nothing to them.
You can't debate with a Liberal. All you can do is shout insults at them to get them to shut up.
Calling them RACIST! is the most effective. Then ask open ended questions like "Why do you hate black people?" "Why do you hate women?" And keep piling on. DON'T STOP. That's how to beat a Liberal in a "debate."
I've done it before. It works!
That's why Trump's campaign is so successful. He doesn't argue with these people. He attacks and lets security escort them to the door.
Are you saying if Romney had beaten Obama in 2012, Romney's wife would be sending this out as a message? Do you mean 2008, and if Hillary had beaten out Obama for the nomination? As far as I remember Obama ran virtually unopposed in the Democratic Party for reelection in 2012, and Clinton was not among those opposing Obama's in the 2012 primaries.
If she had won the nomination and then went on to win the Presidency, in 2008, she may have indeed done the same, created her own private server. However, that would mean she wouldn't have been the FLOTUS, but instead POTUS and Bill would have become the first FMOTUS.
Can you see my confusion as to what your statement meant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.