Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
A Freeper further up the thread verified this story so I will assume it is true. This is not a matter of treating animals better than humans. It's a matter of treating a pet dog humanely.

This is pure conjecture on my part but I'm assuming the dog was put outside out of fear that it might attack or harm the baby. If the fear was legit, then the couple should have gotten the dog adopted into a new home. I know that my wife did not want a dog in the house when our children were small. I disagreed with that but waited for the children to get older before getting a dog, as I did not want to deal with a situation like this, where the dog would be forced by my wife to live outdoors.

I grew up with dogs and cats since I was a baby and I think it's healthy for children to have pets around. But others evidently disagree.

25 posted on 11/22/2015 9:35:11 AM PST by SamAdams76 (It's time we sent a junkyard dog to Washington to run the low life out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
My niece and her husband adopted a chocolate lab named Riley. They trained the heck our of him. when my two Great nephews came along the dog knew how to behave around small children. Heaven help the dumb son of a gun that ever tries to do harm to either of those children.

Another friend of mine has a golden lab named Ranger. They had a son 7 months ago. When the baby falls asleep on the floor the dog curls up around him. Once again I feel sorry for someone that might want to harm that child.

26 posted on 11/22/2015 10:40:11 AM PST by verga (I might as well be playing chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson