Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve
I see that you are using the term “Civil War”. I feel microaggressed - what about using “The War Between the States”, or “The War of Northern Aggression”? (Boy that last one - talk about being “aggressed”!)

I like the term "War of 1861", which shouldn't offend anyone.

27 posted on 11/21/2015 12:57:43 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: reg45
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/07/walter-e-williams/the-war-of-1861/

Thanks - I had never heard of the term “War of 1861”. Found the above link - has some interesting information of the debate going on when they were writing the Constitution. Some were for allowing secession, some were against it. (It ended up being allowed).

Although the name lacks the importance and vastness of the war. Perhaps “The Great War of 1861”. Of course then they would have come up for a different name originally given to WW I!

29 posted on 11/21/2015 1:06:15 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: reg45

I prefer the term “recent unpleasantness”.


99 posted on 11/22/2015 6:50:13 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson