Posted on 11/20/2015 3:13:54 PM PST by Domandred
Oh, really?! No rights for the father, but if the mother wants to keep the baby, he has to pay child-support. Damned if he does and damned if he don’t. How liberal of you. I think you’re in the wrong forum. Why not just go over to HuffPo where you will fit right in with all the FemiNAZIs?
Anyone who would let themselves be given or take someone’s child against that parent’s wishes, is not fit to be a parent.
Agreed. See my post #42.
How much cocaine has to be snorted to come to the conclusion that dad won’t marry mom?
Mom was playing the field.
Mom may want to party and a baby gets in the way.
One sex partner? She doesn’t want that.
If the baby is around being raised by dad she might feel guilty.
If the baby is adopted by people she will never see then that reminder goes away.
Oh, really?! No rights for the father, but if the mother wants to keep the baby, he has to pay child-support. Damned if he does and damned if he don’t. How liberal of you. I think you’re in the wrong forum. Why not just go over to HuffPo where you will fit right in with all the FemiNAZIs?
________________
No, no rights and no responsibilities for the male. None. So why don’t you stop calling names and READ.
Some people read ahead before a knee jerk response, some don’t.
(This, of course, has never happened to me...)
Why don’t you have a Coke and smile and then zip it, you FemiNAZI.
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries. Now go away because I don’t want to talk to you anymore. And be forewarned that if you come back again, I will taunt you a second time.
What a maroon.
RK
Of course. It never occurred to me that it should be otherwise.
People who make recklessly make unwanted pregnancies should get their baby making parts snipped. (reversibly, in case they ever straighten out.)
If the mom signs the baby away, the man, if fit, should have a right to the baby. It's totally wrong that men have no rights whether married or not.
Maybe adoption makes more sense to some people, but the father should have equal rights whether married or not. I hate to see decent, loving men screwed over.
And FReepers most don't know me now, but I have railed against men, too.
I wave my privates in your general direction, cupcake.
Then why should SHE have any rights? Her unmarried self didn't stay zipped either. Women now have sole choice of where the baby goes even past the abortion stage?
Oh that hurts so much coming from smelly chicken farmer whose only companionship comes from her twelve cats. The outside of your house smells like chicken feces and the inside smells like cat urine. I can’t imagine the diseases floating around your property. I suspect your brain is deteriorating as we speak.
Must suck to be you.
Then why should SHE have any rights? Her unmarried self didn’t stay zipped either. Women now have sole choice of where the baby goes even past the abortion stage?
_________________
It is in her body and she owns it.
Actually it is wonderful to be me!
Go away child.
Thank God, at least one sane voice!
Not my meaning. If a woman can put a kid up for adoption without the unmarried father knowing, I think it’s only right that an unmarried man not have to pay child support. Regardless if the mother keeps it or not.
I do not like the system that exists for men. Heads you win, tails I lose.
If this is true, he needs to go to this site and ask for advice from Ohiogal, I’m pretty sure that he has Constitutional rights to his child. Especially if they state has had no reason to remove the child from the home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.