Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

“Psssst: he’s not” still needs an explanation, eh?

“coop71 to BuckeyeTexan
Working against us how? Because if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings for gun control, it’s most definitely not working.

Psssst: he’s not.”

If you read what I wrote, I asked how Obama is working against us, written with the assumption you were implying ihe was working against us through these mass shootings. With this assumption in hand, I immediately offered the example question of “if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, it’s most definitely not working”. Then I finished by saying “psssst: he’s not”, implying, “Hey, here’s a sarcastically poised answer to my own question: he’s not working against us by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, so try again”.

If you still want me banned, go for it.


257 posted on 10/03/2015 11:49:02 AM PDT by coop71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]


To: coop71

I’d like to see you plainly state that Obama is actively working against conservatives. Aside from that, any explanation you offer is a convenient afterthought.

Your posting history is pretty clear to me. You aren’t here for intellectual discussion and debate with conservatives.

Unfortunately, the moderators aren’t at my beck and call. So, carry on.


258 posted on 10/03/2015 12:16:56 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson