Skip to comments.
Thinking the unthinkable: A case for orchestration
10/2/2015
| By Laz A. Mataz
Posted on 10/02/2015 7:23:45 AM PDT by Lazamataz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 321-329 next last
To: coop71
Since you willingly made that statement, I don’t see a need to have you banned. As I said, I can’t “have you banned” anyway.
As for your posting history, anyone who is interested can look into it. I have no desire to prove anything about you or to you. I simply don’t understand why you stay here when your opinion of Freepers and the site in general seems to be more negative than positive.
Again, carry on.
261
posted on
10/03/2015 1:11:20 PM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: BuckeyeTexan
I’ve been here since around 2000, and after lurking for 5 years, I finally signed on in 2005. I’ve seen it all, I’ve read it all.
There’s a pattern to my comments. I’m either asking for clarification or further evidence on something, I’m zinging FR or someone specific for unnecessary insults about an entire group of people (usually women) instead of just the ones who deserve being insulted, I’m making random nutrition comments, or sometimes I just say “right on” or “good comment”. And other than that pattern...and the past 24hrs of my posts, I mostly keep my mouth shut and take it all in.
I genuinely don’t feel as if I can contribute something significant to the vast majority of threads here, so I don’t. Unless something really, really gnaws at me and/or I actually have the time to comment, I just read the articles and threads and don’t comment. It’s as simple as that. And, it explains my posting history.
Never felt like I had to defend my posting history, because, as I explained above, it’s kind of random and sporadic based on multiple extenuating factors.
But it doesn’t mean I’m a liberal.
262
posted on
10/03/2015 1:37:14 PM PDT
by
coop71
To: Lazamataz
263
posted on
10/03/2015 5:40:36 PM PDT
by
antceecee
(Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
To: Lazamataz
Thank you Laz, this exact thought has been on my mind also.
I’ve felt that he is just evil and sinister enough to do that, i think the current democratic front runner is too.
..thanks for “saying” it
To: Finny
I’m not saying they *wouldnt*. I’m saying I think that successful orchestration to produce the intended result at the right TIME is as yet beyond their capability. JMO.
265
posted on
10/03/2015 11:31:47 PM PDT
by
Hetty_Fauxvert
("Cruz." That's the answer. The question is obvious.)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
Im not saying they *wouldnt*. Im saying I think that successful orchestration to produce the intended result at the right TIME is as yet beyond their capability. JMO. An opinion (not to mention hope) I share, but whether they time it wrong or not -- after all, the crazy government conspiracy reality of gas chambers disguised as showers were ultimately timed wrong, but not without killing 6 million and stabbing the heart of a good nation's psyche that lingers to this day -- in today's America, the effort seems to be afoot on many fronts, of government fomenting and dividing, with complicit media to propagandize with credibility.
Germans were and remain, I firmly believe, at their core good and righteous people and for certain sure they would be better allies than enemies; they've always led in aviation tech, for example. Like us I know many thought, "Not here. That's crazy!" They believed what their MSM equivalent told them, at first because it was natural and I suppose later because they wanted to, waking up to the truth was too painful.
Taken each alone, these odd "tragedies" that smell funny and political, are easier to rationalize. But looking across the board, it looks like history rearing its head to repeat itself.
266
posted on
10/04/2015 12:00:32 AM PDT
by
Finny
(Be prepared to own what you vote for. Voting "against" is a mathematical fallacy.)
To: Lazamataz
267
posted on
10/05/2015 7:49:19 AM PDT
by
defconw
(Fight all error, and do it with good humor, patience, kindness and love. -St. John Cantius)
To: Lazamataz
Check that video I sent at around the 17 minute mark.
268
posted on
10/05/2015 7:49:57 AM PDT
by
defconw
(Fight all error, and do it with good humor, patience, kindness and love. -St. John Cantius)
To: defconw; TheOldLady; Cyber Liberty; CatherineofAragon; melissa_in_ga; Slings and Arrows; ...
Steven Seagal gets it.In fact, more and more sober, intelligent people are starting to openly say this.
I know more than one foreign-intelligence people, and they say (off the record, of course) that motivating overseas people to do this sort of stuff is their job, every damn day of the year.
269
posted on
10/10/2015 6:15:26 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: Lazamataz
How would our government make those crazies commit these crimes then?
270
posted on
10/10/2015 6:25:24 AM PDT
by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
To: Bodleian_Girl
sandy hook worked ...
a lot was learned
271
posted on
10/10/2015 6:26:32 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: Lazamataz
Society was not disintegrating so fast and had not reached the current level on the downslope 7 years ago.
272
posted on
10/10/2015 6:34:26 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(It's true.)
To: HandyDandy
Confused and medicated individuals.
273
posted on
10/10/2015 6:36:08 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(It's true.)
To: Lazamataz
Silicone chips for breast control.
274
posted on
10/10/2015 6:37:07 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(It's true.)
To: Wiser now
275
posted on
10/10/2015 6:38:30 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(It's true.)
To: coop71
I glanced through this thread when it first came out ... and left it until today when I had a notice regarding Steven Seagal
I saw so many replies, I started reading backwards and ... my goodness .... you have so much "ban" on your mind and honestly .... I can't figure out how it came to be ... and why you're so obsessed .... so .....
HERE ....
Merry Christmas
276
posted on
10/10/2015 6:40:31 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: MNDude
I don't have any experience in this, but from jsanders2001,
who says he actually did something like this in another career:His post follows:
Its all psychological manipulation with a little assistance from operatives. Just an example of how it could be pulled off...
- Set the goal - create mass shooting at X location.
- Identify target matching psychological profile that would carry out the act. Example - troubled college student with psycholoical problems that is unconfident, has relatiobship problems, one parent family, has anger issues, pays attention or has commented on social problems in social media, is under psychologistss care, is on psychotropic drugs
- Engage target online speaking to issues that anger him acting setting up a profile that appears as the perfect adversary; if he is black, be white supremist; make statements will provoke him over and over into it forments into rage. Make him feel inferior like you are looking down on him. Dare him.
- Ensure that he gets access to a gun via using an operative who is a plant that befriends him using a cover as a student. Plant thoughts that he needs to buy one for self ptotection from the white supremist buddy. Show him websites that feed the hatred and violence to solve his problem (other white people).
- Create emotional disturbances and events that will cause hime to need to unleash. If he has a girlfriend steer her to a white man. She dumps him. He now wants revenge.
- Make sure he takes his meds...
In other words steer him right down the channel to the target incident. All the while he is being monitored and evaluated to ensure that he is manipulated to commit acts if violence that he feels are justified in his drug addled state...
Add to that, the fact that SSRI drugs actually warn, right on the box, of homicidal and suicidal thoughts.....
277
posted on
10/10/2015 6:44:57 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: jsanders2001
Forgot to ping you to the above
278
posted on
10/10/2015 6:45:54 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: Lazamataz
279
posted on
10/10/2015 6:59:07 AM PDT
by
COUNTrecount
(Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
To: defconw
280
posted on
10/10/2015 7:18:07 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 321-329 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson