Posted on 10/02/2015 4:57:17 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Edited on 10/02/2015 5:09:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
It is time to allow concealed carry by permit holders EVERYWHERE right NOW. If Obama REALLY wanted to help the nation against mass shootings he would immediately implement a proposal to pass into FEDERAL law the right for those lawfully getting permits to be able to carry ANYWHERE and be held completely responsible for their actions should they be involved in an incident. However, Obama has a different agenda. He wants to disarm the U.S. public, with an exception for Muslims of course, so he can de facto take over the country and cram is filthy philosophies down our throats.
People at public gatherings and in schools everywhere would immediately be much safer and cowardly psychopaths would be much less likely to be planning shooting incidents in "Gun-free" zones. Please, Ted and Trump's staff, you read here and you can pick this up and run with it. Please, do something to help us.
Oregon, and a lesser-publicized Inglis, Florida mass-shooting.
Boehner will now be a lot more free to defy his base. And if Obama seemed pissed, it was because the second shooting was so small. Note how the two shootings make a perfect diagonal across the country, symbolically bookending us with violence.
It's really hard to be the point-man in this controversial subject -- that the mentally-ill and medicated can and are manipulated to commit acts of mass murder for political gain -- but point-man, I shall be. I'll take the catcalls of "conspiracy theorist" and "tin foil hat wearer" and so on. So long as the dialogue is started, I'll take the heat.
It is actually well-known that low-level microwave radiation can cause deleterious mental effects on the brain:
Effect of low level microwave radiation exposure on cognitive function and oxidative stress in rats.
,a href="4282">Non-Thermal Effect of Microwave Radiation on Human Brain
Nervous and behavioral effects of microwave radiation in humans.
Some of the effects are irritability, sleeplessness, and bad decision-making skills. In the 1970's, the Soviets were bombarding the American embassy in Moscow with these radiations. We objected strongly, and our cover-story was that there were passive eavesdropping devices in the walls... but from the publicly-available research, we know that there was an additional -- perhaps primary -- concern. That concern was that our personnel's mental acuity was lessened by these radiations.
This microwave effect is something we DO know. This research is PUBLIC. What research is there, classified as secret (or beyond) on manipulating and directing a mentally-ill, medicated individual to perform acts suggested by a handler?
The CIA has had decades of experience in 'handling' people, by an agent, to perform actions that are in their best interests. The experience is out there.
Before anyone tells me that Obama and his minions would never allow innocents to come to harm, to advance a gun control agenda, I remind you of Fast and Furious, the ATF gun-running scandal, in which semi-automatic firearms were allowed to end up in the hands of Mexican drug gangs. Many innocent people died, from this scandal alone. Obama has shown quite clearly, the ability to promote the death of innocent people so that he can get his precious gun bans.
The name of that courageous lady is Suzanna Hupp and her testimony in US Senate, about the meaning of the second amendment can be seen right here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis
Take a look at the face of Schummer(a rabid gun control guy),please.
Bingo!
bump
Well then it's up to the people of Maryland to get their legislature to change the laws.
Although they think themselves intellectually superior, if they do think the above then logic and/or reason never kick in to their thought process.
(I know that my comments are obvious to FReepers, but apparently it still can't be repeated enough.)
No criminal ever obeyed any law.
MD still invalidates your point about “within reason.”
Maryland is NOT reasonable, probably not reformable and I’m getting the he!! out as soon as I can.
From one who lives there.
You are so right. Also, I'm worried about the dead ones in the Chicago area becoming zombies stalking us. They also voted for Obama.
“Because Congress exercises sole legislative control of property belonging to the federal government. That’s in Article I, Section 8. And that includes post offices.”
Exactly and Congress has overstepped its moral authority in this if not its legal one. No way should a citizen run afoul of any law because of a legally obtained gun locked in a vehicle in a parking lot. Just “Because Congress exercises sole legislative control of property belonging to the federal government” doesn’t mean it does so according to the second amendment.
“A US Constitutional Amendment trumps state law, does it not?
Which is why states cannot ban gun ownership. But even the Supreme Court has said that states have the power to regulate ownership within reason. If a state wants to require that a CCW holder complete training classes prior to receiving their permit then why should the federal government say that they can’t do that?”
I generally come down on the side of states rights, but the second amendment is pretty clear that guns cannot be banned. The issue of states making it harder to obtain guns is a slippery slope and addressing that is beyond the scope of what I meant in my post.
I was responding to this:
“Sodomy is declared a federal right thru-out the nation and RKBA is on a case-by-case basis.
I’m assuming you have no problems with that since you are advocating that the Federal Government take over yet another state responsibility.”
All I was saying is that just because someone wants the US government to tell the state governments to keep their hands off of our self protection as stated in the Bill of Rights, no less, it doesn’t mean that the same person would also like to see the federal government meddling in affairs of the states in ways that are not specifically described in the US Constitution. Neither homosexuality nor the legal union of two people of same sex is not mentioned in the US Constitution. Therefore, the two instances are not equivalent. Homosexuality should never have been a federal issue to begin with and SCOTUS engaged in an act of judicial tyranny.
That old derelict is pathetic, stupid and hateful.
you are correct, but if i’m at the mall and not carrying that day, i would pike to know who to hide behind, should that become necessary
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.