Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Michelle has a classical large-hipped, very fleshed-out female figure. While it is not stylishly attractive by today’s western standards, it is definitely a female figure along the lines of the Rubenesque woman of the nineteenth century. She has none of the large Adam’s apple or shoulders that you see in men pretending to be women.

The liberal support of the alphabet people is because they want to destroy the essential building block of western culture, the family. It was one of the communist goals for destroying America. (No. 40.)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1561529/posts


6 posted on 09/27/2015 10:02:21 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather
body build alone is not indicative of your sexuality...

and the fingers....if you look at my hands, you'll see arthritis twisting my fingers but I've always had small hands but my fingers are not typical of a female...although I know I stubbed several fingers as a kid....I am definitely not transgender...

however, add it all up...the large shoulders...the hands..the crock shots...the manly abrasive nature...the lack of normal female concerns...the white hut creep referring to her as "micheal" and the lack of any background info or pics of "Michele" as a pregnant woman ....just add it all up...then it makes perfect sense....

the power of the media to conjure up any tale they want...

18 posted on 09/27/2015 10:44:12 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson