Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MinorityRepublican

In the absence of natural selection, negative mutations accumulate more readily. (It turns out they accumulate anyway under natural selection, which is fighting a sort of rear guard action against their inevitable accumulation.) We see a similar phenomena in domestic cats versus wild felines in studies of neuron development.


2 posted on 09/16/2015 6:48:21 PM PDT by Another Post-American (Jesus died for your sins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Another Post-American

No, it’s all selective breeding. And even then, certain characteristics do not go away.


10 posted on 09/16/2015 6:53:35 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Another Post-American

You’re referencing human specie, right?


37 posted on 09/16/2015 9:53:26 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Another Post-American

Well, not just that, but the domestication process itself would weed out the very smartest of animals, because you don’t keep breeding the ones that are constantly trying to escape, disobey you, assert dominance over humans, etc. You want to keep breeding the more “beta” animals instead, because they will naturally look to the humans for leadership.


39 posted on 09/16/2015 10:44:59 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson