After exhaustive studies have proven otherwise, from the article:
“If Scott Walker or any other politician wants to argue for a taxpayer stadium, he can point to civic pride, prestige, or other non-tangible benefits. But if he reads the stack of studies from every side of the political spectrum, he cannot in good conscience argue that it will create an economic benefit.”
Your usual bullshit post.
‘Exhaustive studies’ - all generalities not addressing the specific economics of this situation.
It was very clear that the NBA required a newer facility for the league or the team would be transferred.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10818521/nba-buy-milwaukee-bucks-no-arena-construction-2017
We know precisely what the payers pay in taxes, we know precisely what it would cost to maintain an empty Bradley center.
This decision gained support of the public based on the specific factors involved, including me.