To: BroJoeK
"I wasn't referring to the "British" standards, I was referring to *YOUR* standards. If YOUR standards were in effect in 1776, *YOU* wouldn't allow the colonists to secede. That is what I meant by usage of the word "permitted". I meant permitted by you and your notion of conditional rights contingent upon your approval." Just one of the many many lies and strawmen by dimbulb.
It imputes a "standard" to you and then goes about the task of tossing it like a Molotov cocktail into the room.
652 posted on
07/30/2015 3:59:16 PM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: BroJoeK; Team Cuda; EternalVigilance; x; Tau Food; Partisan Gunslinger
If there was still any nagging doubt about its liberal tactics, just take a gander at the DegenerateLamp’s post #657
661 posted on
07/30/2015 4:37:52 PM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: rockrr
Just one of the many many lies and strawmen by dimbulb. Mr. Union cheerleader, I very much suspect you do not actually know what is a "strawman", but I have little doubt you grasp "lies" all too well.
It imputes a "standard" to you and then goes about the task of tossing it like a Molotov cocktail into the room.
When people keep bringing up their reasons for leaving as if it precludes their right to leave, then they have expressed a standard.
Their standard is that people don't have a right to leave unless those people leave for reasons with which they agree.
677 posted on
07/30/2015 6:12:31 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson