At minimum Williams is questioning his opposition.
Was President Abraham Lincoln really for outlawing slavery? Let's look at his words.
Much of this article consists of his rather lame and entirely inaccurate attempt to say Lincoln was not particularly opposed to slavery.
And that is a fair question. Anyone who would trade slavery for dominance over others, certainly does not regard slavery as the priority.
Much of this article consists of his rather lame and entirely inaccurate attempt to say Lincoln was not particularly opposed to slavery.
Relative to ruling over the South, he wasn't. He says so many times. Between the two issues, slavery is less important to him than holding the Southern States.
Why are you quibbling over William's salient point?